Redditing-Dutchman

Redditing-Dutchman t1_je47o6d wrote

Yes integration is key here. If its just a platform where you have to ask it do stuff everytime like chatGPT it will not be very useful. It needs to be able to set goals and tasks by itself. Like if it needs to make weekly excel sheets reports it needs to do that every week automatically. Without having to imput the data every time into a seperate website.

2

Redditing-Dutchman t1_je09va9 wrote

Would the robot then stand in the kitchen washing dishes manually? That sounds very inefficient as the dishwasher can run while the the robot cleans the house for example... Plus I would be very annoyed if a humanoid robot stands in my small kitchen half of the day doing stuff there while a dishwasher is neatly packed away.

1

Redditing-Dutchman t1_jdr1rsl wrote

These models also have a random function thats why it gives a slighly different answer even if you ask the same question again. With text this is ok-ish but with math you need to be precise.

Even then it might get common stuff right but i can easily think of a sum that in the history of the internet has never been said before: 568753334668864468000 + 7654778875 + 433367886554.

2

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j9esi6v wrote

There are many things 'looming' on the horizon. Someone into the 'Collapse' might laugh at you because we won't have time to reach AGI (collapsing energy grids, climate change, etc).

Someone into the Russian war might laugh at them because nukes will fly next year.

Someone into economy might say that everything is going to crash massively

Someone into biology might say that we will all be dead soon because antibiotics won't work anymore within a few years.

Are you following all these things closely? All of them claim it's coming soon and that nobody is talking about it enough.

4

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j966dak wrote

In the beginning of this year Deepmind laid off a big part of it's staff (just like many tech companies).The Deepmind research facility in Edmonton was even closed completely.

Could be that progress is actually slower or even halted because of this, or they kept the basic team and fired people like the blog writer for example.

16

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j8xgmku wrote

Lobotomised sounds so extreme lol. It's just weights and rulesets being adjusted. They do this hundreds of times in testing. We don't even know how this 'Sydney' was compared to all the versions in testing. Maybe this was already a weird 'lobotomised' version of it.

3

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j7kkw02 wrote

wasn't the issue with Amazon that ChatGPT actually new some stuff from Amazon that should have been secret?

The point here was that some of that info apparently ended up in its training data. Hence why employees need to be more careful where they put/post stuff.

1

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j7dekms wrote

Hmm yes I was thinking about this. Currently nobody talks about the power usage of chatGPT. It's quite a lot per prompt and this is only going to get worse as the models get bigger and bigger.

A black swan event could be that we simply don't have enough power available to unlock the true potential of AI in the next few years and that progress is being held back because of these power shortages.

2

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j6zihvo wrote

Yes you are correct. There are already many websites that offer deepfake options, and since you can upload any picture, and any video that you want to replace the faces in, people can upload whatever, and whoever, they want.

I'm quite happy that I'm not in school anymore. Cyberbullying will be so easy this way. School is such a fast moving social environment that even if you had detectors for deepfakes, nobody would care. Damage would already been done.

0

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j6we5rm wrote

Customer support for sure. It's already automated in a lot of places, often with very basic chatbots. I just hope it also makes it better for tech savvy people. I really hate dealing with customer support if they go trough all the basic steps first. "Yes I've turned if off and on already 100 times before I called you.'

6