Hen-stepper

Hen-stepper t1_jaxuyql wrote

That's not a great argument considering she could have just killed herself before going on a murder fest.

There's no real causality either... sort of like saying if Big Macs had 3 patties instead of 2 patties some passengers would have gotten sick on 9-11, missed their flights, and lived. So therefore Big Macs should have 3 patties.

106

Hen-stepper t1_j8iccql wrote

You cited the SJC’s actions and now you are upset that I referenced that same resource?

You think you can bully other people around because they don’t conform to your ideology. That’s what this is about and it is coming out right now. People of your ilk made the political right into what they are the day today.

0

Hen-stepper t1_j8i8mky wrote

These are politicians… I don’t know why people think it is unlikely that Biden has some connection to China. Even if it isn’t meaningful. I voted for Jill Stein who had connections to Russia. Trump had connections to Russia. A judge couldn’t remark about Trump’s possible connection to Putin? Why??

This is purely political. The townies here hate anything that resembles conservative thought.

−2

Hen-stepper t1_j8i3crk wrote

Excuse me, but the contradiction is entirely yours. I have had an entire discussion with you and I am addressing each point. You are extrapolating everything from a screenshot of a Facebook post.

You said that one does not even need to know about the person’s qualifications as a judge, that this post in particular is sufficient. There is a contradiction because one does need to know about the person to determine whether they will make or remain a good judge. You are not being assessed for any job and your entire line of reasoning here only proves that you fail to pay attention.

−26

Hen-stepper t1_j8i2j38 wrote

I do not believe you know what makes a qualified or unqualified judge. By your logic, you are saying that if a judge in their personal life is vegan, speaks about it, and a judge’s job is to be impartial, then your conclusion is that the judge should be fired? Judges have to be saints with no bias towards anything? Or what you are saying is they can be biased but cannot express this?

ACAB and BLM are absolutely different because a judge works with cops and black people. A judge’s very mild personal opinion about Joe Biden and China has absolutely nothing to do with their job. A judge’s job is to interpret the law.

You are witch hunting this judge because at face value you believe that you disagree with his politics. Based on a screen shot from Facebook.

−6

Hen-stepper t1_j8hy2ph wrote

What are you essentially saying is that you either do not wish to or are incapable of refuting this judge’s assertion, which you call a conspiracy theory, and so due to your lack of effort or ability you have decided that it is better to get the person fired. In my mind that is an authoritarian mindset and an anti-debate mindset. I disagree with your methodology and the world that anti-intellectual social media brutes have created.

It doesn’t even dawn on you that the person’s view can be changed through persuasion. It’s just that they are “bad” which is ridiculous and false.

−13

Hen-stepper t1_j1djiv4 wrote

It’s crazy seeing the cognitive dissonance here of cop haters who love dogs.

I guess their hatred of cops blinds their opinion because they fail to notice that these dogs are risking their lives for human beings.

Of course they deserve an ambulance if that helps. They didn’t choke on a Pop Tart… they are risking their lives for another species.

2

Hen-stepper t1_isf40m7 wrote

I thought a lot about this too. Yes, the pension is great, if it is still around by the time we retire.

Even if it's a 5% chance that it goes bankrupt or something breaks, that is basically a 5% risk of death. That is what losing one's source of income at an old age means.

So I consider it neutral. 401k matching is a much safer option in my book. Especially if you aim to max it out.

2