zeus-fox
zeus-fox t1_j2codgq wrote
I think they probably don’t have a problem with accessibility options, more like a problem with something detracting from the vision of the game.
I’ll try an analogy but bare with me as It’s past my bedtime; imagine you go to a restaurant that serves only sushi and ask why they don’t have cooked beef in the sushi instead of raw fish because you’re allergic to fish and you love beef. It’s not unreasonable to say to that person, perhaps a sushi bar isn’t for you!
I hope that makes some kind of sense? Like I said it’s very late here and I’m probably not great at analogies at the best of times!
zeus-fox t1_j2cttbc wrote
Reply to comment by nxlss in Why are some people against accessibility options? by [deleted]
Well I suppose the vegan option/accessible game would be a different item on the menu, which would be an entirely different game. Those games do exist but if you want to play this specific game or eat this specific piece of sushi it’s going have no easy mode and/or be made of fish…
…man I’m confusing myself.