work-a-day_schlub
work-a-day_schlub t1_itsv5u1 wrote
Reply to comment by o-ater in LPT REQUEST: How do you nicely decline to answer a question? by letstradeshallwe
Both of these things are true simultaneously. Yes, you can protect your privacy at all cost and treat people coldly. You can also cause yourself future difficulties because people don't trust or like you because you've treated them like NPCs and not people. We all have our priorities.
Edit: people don't develop "self awareness" when you treat their polite interest with hostility. They assume things about you because you've given them no other choice.
work-a-day_schlub t1_itrvupg wrote
Reply to comment by o-ater in LPT REQUEST: How do you nicely decline to answer a question? by letstradeshallwe
Think whatever you like. Delivery has a lot to do with it but it still won't make a person feel good and they probably won't tell you that. Nothing about that response would make a person feel you are flattered by their question. It will make them feel you are being cagy and intentionally withholding.
work-a-day_schlub t1_itrat4g wrote
Reply to comment by o-ater in LPT REQUEST: How do you nicely decline to answer a question? by letstradeshallwe
You don't have to own them, no. But, you do have to work with these people so the consequences of burning bridges is still very real.
work-a-day_schlub t1_itqkp3y wrote
Reply to comment by spoonfullofrage in LPT REQUEST: How do you nicely decline to answer a question? by letstradeshallwe
It's a diversionary tactic which could make a person feel defensive since you are directly choosing not to answer their question.
It could also be interpreted as aggressive or implying the asker has nefarious intent.
work-a-day_schlub t1_itt4wj3 wrote
Reply to comment by o-ater in LPT REQUEST: How do you nicely decline to answer a question? by letstradeshallwe
We'll have to agree to disagree