the-powl
the-powl t1_j98ook3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in AI Enhancement of classical music - would you notice the difference? by AlpineDimi
Gosh you're miserable 🙄
the-powl t1_j98o27u wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in AI Enhancement of classical music - would you notice the difference? by AlpineDimi
Well first you said altering the work of someone after his dead is morally corrupt. Then you said it's okay if the one who holds the rights gives you permission. The first point is general enough that it contradicts the second though.
Anyway it's totally fine to reuse someones work. Above all for personal use.
the-powl t1_j98mmk1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in AI Enhancement of classical music - would you notice the difference? by AlpineDimi
so that makes it morally different? your point is flawed 😅
the-powl t1_j87grwv wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in Recursive self-improvement (intelligence explosion) cannot be far away by Kaarssteun
>Technological recursive self improvement has always been going on in the background
What do you exactly mean by that?
the-powl t1_j85qgbj wrote
Reply to comment by BassoeG in ChatGPT Powered Bing Chatbot Spills Secret Document, The Guy Who Tricked Bot Was Banned From Using Bing Chat by vadhavaniyafaijan
that doesn't work just like asking you for writing out the construction plans if your own brain.
the-powl t1_j5hn2pp wrote
Reply to NVIDIA just released a new Eye Contact feature that uses AI to make you look into the camera by strangesmagic
this staring is kinda creepy tho
the-powl t1_j5hlri0 wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in Can humanity find purpose in a world where AI is more capable than humans? by IamDonya
sorry, but you guys can't even spell ChatGPT 🤔
the-powl t1_j5g19e6 wrote
Reply to comment by Reddinaut in How have you been using chatGPT to improve your life? by zendogsit
but doesn't it spit out bs often times? code that doesn't work, misinterprets your prompts or just invents functions that don't exist? Because that's my experience with ChatGPT
the-powl t1_j4hzjvm wrote
What's being ignored in your idea is that ChatGPT itself doesn't consist of code. It's a large artificial neural network, trained on huge amounts of data. It's not an algorithm. The solution of the problem of making it better is not to throw more coding power onto it. Instead you need better concepts, more/better training data, huge amounts of computing time, more human feedback. You can't just take a "chunk of code" of the network and "improve it".
the-powl t1_j2fdqfb wrote
Reply to comment by idknoah in Thought y’all might like this, we are getting closer! by jaketocake
walking around in uneven terrain, mobile camera, delivering stuff, operating in dangerous areas, being a digital guard dog and so on
in a few years/decades: walking around, killing people
the-powl t1_j2fdgxy wrote
I think the progress was already pretty fast this year. The imagination that it'll go even faster in the future is pretty uncomfortable to me. I already have the feeling that I can't keep up with technical innovation. I don't want to get left behind but also don't want to spend most of my free time in learning new things.
the-powl t1_j23t4mi wrote
Reply to Digitism by ZoomedAndDoomed
lmao, what if I told you, you can do all of that but withouth calling it "Digitism" and worshipping something?
the-powl t1_j0sd4tr wrote
Reply to comment by Shelfrock77 in Assuming we don’t destroy ourselves first, are humans headed towards a networked hive mind, Borg like civilization? by BizarreGlobal
I'd love to be wrong here but there's neither scientific evidence for this nor do we know of physical/biological mechanism by which this would be possible
the-powl t1_ja7hnib wrote
Reply to Weird feeling about AI, need find ig somebody has same feeling by polda604
I feel you bro