something-quirky-
something-quirky- t1_jabbxfh wrote
Reply to [oc] Currently this is the hiring process/model of recruitment between candidates and employers in the US since 2021 & forward. Data/Procedures with SankeyMATIC by Likeitisouthere
Wait a minute. 29 “ghosted for my well-being” I assume means that you were performing well enough in the interview process, but purposefully went no contact? Seems disingenuous to the job search tbh.
something-quirky- t1_ja2zzk6 wrote
Reply to What Happens From Here? by B3stAuD1t0rofA11tiME
Well the answer is quite clear, surprised you couldn’t figure it out for yourself. The numbers may go, or it could possibly go down.
something-quirky- t1_j4o99ic wrote
Reply to 1980 Census Map of Chicago by natty_g42
I appreciate the airport as a landmark, but I think Hyde Park would work a bit better
something-quirky- t1_j2p9p0y wrote
Reply to [OC] 2022: Life in Booleans by randomo_redditor
October was a crazy month for your bowels
something-quirky- t1_j27nvh1 wrote
Reply to [OC] Comparing betting strategy returns for all Grand Slams since 2007 by MrBookman_LibraryCop
This data and your assessment is kind of the bookies dream. In a world where no choice is the profitable choice for the gambler then the house wins. A chart like this might be worth showing a sportsbook if you’re trying to pitch a more effective odds generator
something-quirky- t1_j27nlct wrote
Reply to comment by derphurr in [OC] Comparing betting strategy returns for all Grand Slams since 2007 by MrBookman_LibraryCop
Yes plz. Took me 5 minutes to understand what i was looking at because of fav/under dog label placement
something-quirky- t1_j264xk1 wrote
Reply to comment by WaterScienceProf in Lego world map of energy to harvest water from the atmosphere [OC] https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee01071b by WaterScienceProf
I think you’re forgetting is that the atmospheric harvesting wouldn’t be evenly distributed across the globe. As your map points out, there would be spots that would be better then other. So you’d expect that the harvesting plants would be not be evenly distributed. So while you may only be extracting some fraction of a percent from the entire globe, you’d be extracting a much larger percentage in the context of the local area. It’s like saying “its okay if i drain this lake because it only takes up .00001% of global fresh water” meanwhile you’ve used up 10% of the LOCAL freshwater. You’re also mischaracterizing the problem. Sure, humans only need 8 cups of water to drink… but you also need to use the toilet, and take a shower, and wash your clothes, and wash your dishes, and cook etc. And you can’t just pump in dirty water for everything that isn’t for drinking. It’s just passing the buck is what it is, and I’d be willing to bet that the resulting weather patterns from this practice would be just as devastating as draining the rivers and streams.
something-quirky- t1_j2499r6 wrote
Reply to Lego world map of energy to harvest water from the atmosphere [OC] https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee01071b by WaterScienceProf
Ah yes, messing with atmosphere. Totally a good idea. I suppose there would be water harvesting companies that would do this? They would probably do it really responsibly :)
something-quirky- t1_jabdgtl wrote
Reply to comment by Likeitisouthere in [oc] Currently this is the hiring process/model of recruitment between candidates and employers in the US since 2021 & forward. Data/Procedures with SankeyMATIC by Likeitisouthere
Word salad