recockulous-too
recockulous-too t1_j25dvw4 wrote
My guess is they will pretend to do it but the “donation” will actually come from Putin and his buddies that haven’t fallen down stairs.
recockulous-too t1_j1a28iz wrote
Reply to comment by Soytaco in WTO on ‘Thin Ice’ With Metals-Tariff Ruling, US Trade Chief Says by defenestrate_urself
Yes I agree with your other reason but it wouldn’t be a National security reason.
Subsidizing the steel industry is the same as tariffs as far as the WTO is concerned. But instead of the tax payers paying for it, it would be by companies and end users of the steel and aluminum. You can say that the consumer ultimately pays the same but the main difference is that the consumer has a choice whether or not to use it without increasing national debt.
recockulous-too t1_j19b9al wrote
Reply to comment by ohokayiguess1 in WTO on ‘Thin Ice’ With Metals-Tariff Ruling, US Trade Chief Says by defenestrate_urself
My Opinion is I feel the US is correct, the US steel industry has been decimated by low cost imports from other areas of the world. They can’t compete. Especially in wages and energy costs. The tariffs reverse this. So imagine if all or most of the steel becomes imported and therefore shutters the US steel industry. In case of War time how long would it take to restart and train the employees needed to supply domestically if imported steel becomes scarce or blocked. This is why I think this is a national security issue.
recockulous-too t1_iu22cv7 wrote
Reply to Afghan Elite Commandos Abandoned By US Being Recruited By Wagner Group For Russia: Report by Heavy-Ad6366
I hope they get paid in full before going or good luck collecting. Current Russian policy you get paid when Russia wins or free bullet with express delivery.
recockulous-too t1_j61v44j wrote
Reply to Russia slams new EU mission to Armenia, says it will stoke tensions by DavidofSasun
I didn’t realize there was any tensions between Russia and Europe.
Just in case /S