r-reading-my-comment

r-reading-my-comment t1_jee8akn wrote

Well regulated militia- one that has military grade arms.

This is blatantly obvious from our 18th-19th century FEDERAL laws, which did things like requiring American males to be able to arm themselves with a rifle or musket in a short period of time. Hell, you could even buy cannons… that’s artillery.

Now find me a federal law that requires a U.S. militia member to be trained, or that limited their access to guns. One from back in the day.

1

r-reading-my-comment t1_jcfl8ua wrote

Do you think someone’s saying Europeans don’t know their history when new Roman settlements are found?

Stop trying to start fires.

Edit: forgot to write that reading the article will also help, that said the you’re also misrepresenting the title.

51

r-reading-my-comment t1_ja3e2yw wrote

0

r-reading-my-comment t1_ja0v1su wrote

Give some info. I’m getting “delivery people” as being the highest, but that includes all delivery drivers… Dominos to Brinks.

Other sites are saying it’s cops or cops/security.

They also say law enforcement has the most general violence committed against them. Not dying because you have a bullet proof vest on skews the data.

Edit: how dare I say someone should back something up, especially after their advice failed

3

r-reading-my-comment t1_iyavps1 wrote

Highly doubtful.

They're civilians that will be voluntarily going into an active warzone. I hope they stay safe and productive, but this isn't that different from the Americans, Brits and other NATO veterans that are fighting over there.

8

r-reading-my-comment t1_iyauz4b wrote

I doubt they're sending any military engineers, and civilians will have voluntarily gone there. This won't be very different from killing foreign fighters... at least to a military that has no problem attacking residential areas.

It would suck, but what would NATO do besides sanctions?

6