qj-_-tp

qj-_-tp t1_jcg8y93 wrote

While those conjectures are fascinating to debate, at some point an ice pick to the temple obviates the need to make any further payments, or have tedious ongoing non-consensual encounters with violent criminals.
I get that’s a different debate. But I think variety in debates leads to better, more optimal outcomes, so we should consider it.
“How many times has it been? Three? Here’s the situation, I don’t have cash handy, but I have something of equivalent value that I can give you instead.” “Well, don’t just stand there, gimme!” And thus the infinite regression is averted and, bonus, after cleaning the ice pick, it can be used again if needed elsewhere.

6

qj-_-tp t1_jaa73cr wrote

I call trolling. The other party is more correct than you are, though each raised valid points. Trolls lose by forfeit immediately after being outed. Therefore, you lose. And don’t think you can sucker me with more trolling; whether you have good points to make or not, troll == loss. I’m done with you; your loss.

2