nyet-marionetka
nyet-marionetka t1_je4i0v5 wrote
Reply to comment by HelenEk7 in Vegan diets benefit health, but only if they're healthy. Study found a healthy vegan diet was linked to lower risk of heart disease, cancer and premature death, compared with non-vegan diets. N=125,000 by MistWeaver80
I bet if you’re eating an unhealthy vegan diet you are probably not paying adequate attention to vitamin B12 and essential amino acids, so probably so.
nyet-marionetka t1_je4fqvu wrote
Reply to comment by HelenEk7 in Vegan diets benefit health, but only if they're healthy. Study found a healthy vegan diet was linked to lower risk of heart disease, cancer and premature death, compared with non-vegan diets. N=125,000 by MistWeaver80
Sounds like they lumped all non-vegan diets together there, so looking at the average healthiness non-vegan diet.
nyet-marionetka t1_jdhdnuc wrote
Reply to comment by Superb-Draft in Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon
No, you don’t get it on reddit. That could happen from cross-subreddit posting if someone points a community in your direction, but the admins crack down on that. A bunch of individual people stumbling on your comment and disagreeing with you isn’t the same as a person sending their followers to stalk you online, trash talk you in your comments, and post their own stuff targeted at you. Reddit is generally a pretty civil place by comparison to tiktok and tumblr.
nyet-marionetka t1_jdh7pfj wrote
Reply to comment by sunforthemoon in Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon
That kind of stuff happens on platforms like TikTok, tumblr, and Twitter, where a group forms a silo and sic the group on people they don’t like, like angry chickens pecking an injured chicken to death. It happens over any topic with enough fans. Probably more with TV shows because the audiences are bigger.
nyet-marionetka t1_jdh7ei5 wrote
Reply to Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon
TikTok is like Youtube comments, but worse.
nyet-marionetka t1_jcau13v wrote
Reply to comment by PM-ME-HOLES in Why read Tolkien? by PM-ME-HOLES
Movies aren’t books.
nyet-marionetka t1_jbe0dyo wrote
Reply to comment by UterineTemple in Oral hygiene, mouthwash usage and cardiovascular mortality during 18.8 years of follow-up - oral hygiene self-care OHS was associated with a 51% reduction in the risk of CVD mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49 [0.28-0.85]; p = 0.01). by Meatrition
I think there’s more to it than that. Very bad dental hygiene has a risk of endocarditis. Bacteria can enter the bloodstream through damaged mucosa in the mouth and colonize heart valves. I’ve seen it proposed for years now that this happening to a lesser extent can contribute to systemic inflammation that contributes to cardiovascular disease.
Edit: Also the study found mouthwash itself doesn’t do a damn thing.
nyet-marionetka t1_ja99une wrote
Reply to comment by claimingthemoorland in Red Dragon by Thomas Harris is a perfectly okay thriller with a gem of a sex scene of the darkest shade of violence. by claimingthemoorland
I enjoy relationships based upon fear in my fiction. Maybe I’ll give it a try.
nyet-marionetka t1_ja843pv wrote
Reply to comment by claimingthemoorland in Red Dragon by Thomas Harris is a perfectly okay thriller with a gem of a sex scene of the darkest shade of violence. by claimingthemoorland
Does the book have all the erotic subtext between Hannibal and Graham that the show does (and that before I watched it I thought fanfiction authors totally made up)?
nyet-marionetka t1_ja7psqf wrote
Did the author intend me to burst into laughter at the summary of their book?
nyet-marionetka t1_j8wfzg6 wrote
Reply to comment by ActualMis in Compared to wolf pups and kittens, dog puppies tend to spontaneously match actions demonstrated by a human — even in the absence of food rewards by marketrent
Cats tend to do this too, pee in the bathtub or sink. I am not sure why. Maybe drain odors smell to them like “this is the place to urinate”, or maybe it’s something about the smooth surface, though I would think carpet would seem better to pee on.
nyet-marionetka t1_j8e2asq wrote
Reply to comment by Kailaylia in Cultivating a sense of perspective about pet loss can lead to post-traumatic growth after their death by chrisdh79
I’m so sorry about your cat. We’ve lost two in the past couple years and will probably lose another within the next year. It’s so sad that they don’t live longer. Our sweet cat is 18 and that’s still not enough time.
nyet-marionetka t1_j8czn49 wrote
Reply to comment by lappel-do-vide in Cultivating a sense of perspective about pet loss can lead to post-traumatic growth after their death by chrisdh79
Some people may not have much competition between lousy family and an affectionate pet.
nyet-marionetka t1_j6hko6m wrote
Reply to comment by Bruno_Vieira in Study uncovers a surprising level of heterogeneity in psychopathy among condemned capital murderers: While a substantial proportion of the offenders exhibited heightened psychopathic features, others showed no signs of psychopathy by HeinieKaboobler
Regular people can turn off their empathy if they make it a priority.
nyet-marionetka t1_j4qd2o5 wrote
Reply to comment by walking-the-ashes in Why don’t I, as a woman, like books with female protagonists? by out_cyder
>I think historically there's still much more misunderstanding of female nature compared to male one. That's why male characters are subjectively more universal and flexible and make a better vessel for a wide range of writers' endeavors.
This is weird because you seem to think that women don’t know themselves and are incapable of writing stories about women, because their own identity has been masked from them. On the other hand, male characters are completely accessible and women can write about them easily.
I think that there is nothing unique about men versus women, and they’re basically all people. So saying “people can’t write women” is incoherent to me. A person might have difficulty writing a particular type of character (like I think I’d have a hard time writing a very self-conscious and approval-seeking person, because that’s not me), but globally not being able to write characters of one gender only works if a person is operating within a very sexist framework where women are some mysterious unknowable other, and is much less likely if the author is that gender.
Based on your previously stated preferences, I’d suggest the Broken Earth trilogy and The Library at Mount Char.
nyet-marionetka t1_j4q6ffh wrote
Reply to comment by walking-the-ashes in Why don’t I, as a woman, like books with female protagonists? by out_cyder
lol sure
nyet-marionetka t1_j4q3p2i wrote
Reply to comment by walking-the-ashes in Why don’t I, as a woman, like books with female protagonists? by out_cyder
Literally every female character ever written is totally stereotypical, vastly more than male characters? Women can’t write female characters but somehow do much better at writing male characters? It sounds more like you have a toggle where you just flip it off if the character is female and nothing will fly for you.
nyet-marionetka t1_j4q39kx wrote
Reply to comment by walking-the-ashes in Why don’t I, as a woman, like books with female protagonists? by out_cyder
This makes no sense.
nyet-marionetka t1_j4q247h wrote
What genres are you reading for male characters and female characters?
nyet-marionetka t1_ixmhfev wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Researchers have found that lab mice are more likely to survive a flu infection if they are fed grain-based foods rather than processed food: after being infected with influenza, all of those fed the highly processed diet died, all the other have recovered by giuliomagnifico
??? Your comment is partially garbled grammar, but additionally cheese contains casein, so how is casein sinister but cheese good?
nyet-marionetka t1_iubt5qk wrote
Reply to Why I stopped using Goodreads by [deleted]
I use Goodreads because a friend does, and it reduces the “what was that book again??” problem. If it’s stressing you, don’t use it.
nyet-marionetka t1_iu7fghu wrote
Reply to comment by authorPGAusten in To my Romance readers: Is explicit s.a. to be expected at this point or am I just incredibly unlucky? by enJ0eable
This is probably a good response for about any thread here.
nyet-marionetka t1_iu7fbkg wrote
Reply to comment by joyjesoh in To my Romance readers: Is explicit s.a. to be expected at this point or am I just incredibly unlucky? by enJ0eable
You can have fast burn romance and casual sex with complete respect of consent for both parties.
nyet-marionetka t1_iu7ez7h wrote
Reply to comment by voornaam1 in To my Romance readers: Is explicit s.a. to be expected at this point or am I just incredibly unlucky? by enJ0eable
That’s that genre (anime/manga). There is a bunch of other media that doesn’t have that approach.
nyet-marionetka t1_je9zxhn wrote
Reply to I've entered my Ngaio Marsh phase by falling_fire
Then try Rex Stout for a change of pace.