m-in
m-in t1_j5h4nr6 wrote
Reply to comment by myunqusrnm in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
I think the takeaway is that tea tree oil is not nether-compatible. TIL!
m-in t1_j5h4aur wrote
Reply to comment by Crash4654 in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
You have a point, although the “summary” is a bit lacking in detail :). The pine tree oil IIRC also has the “no razor burn” admonition even though it seems comparatively inert.
m-in t1_j5h0016 wrote
Reply to comment by YazZy_4 in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
TIL. Thank you! Pine it is for us then.
m-in t1_j5gm9ct wrote
Reply to comment by Crash4654 in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
Have you actually read that label on that particular soap? Can you summarize it for us? I bet you can’t. What does it make your reading comp then?
m-in t1_j5gm45b wrote
Reply to comment by Crash4654 in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
I tried. Gagged from the verbal diarrhea. The product is good but the BS they put on the bottle is insane.
m-in t1_j5glyzw wrote
Reply to comment by myunqusrnm in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
Really? Me & my wife use the pine oil version regularly with no ill effects. Is the tea tree oil that much worse?
m-in t1_j076r6d wrote
Reply to comment by ProfessionEuphoric50 in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
Actually, fusion made more efficiency progress than solar in that same time frame! Like, several times higher efficiency gain.
m-in t1_j0764mk wrote
Reply to comment by Azurtanium-22 in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
Solar and wind absolutely has the power density needed to completely replace fossil fuels for stationary (residential, commercial) and storage battery use (EVs and such).
Once you have a lot of solar and wind energy available, it’s no big deal to use thermal storage systems. Yeah they waste about 50% of energy but they also are much more durable and energy dense than any battery storage system using research-stage tech, never mind what you can actually buy.
m-in t1_j075ou0 wrote
Reply to comment by isleepinahammock in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
The lasers we use for practical purposes in production environments you mention only share the name and general operating principle with those used at NIF. Calling both “lasers” is technically correct but practically absurd.
m-in t1_j075dpf wrote
Reply to comment by Kioer in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
Lasers don’t directly induce fusion. They take some other “working fluid” like gold plasma and dump energy into it. That then can fuse something else that’s the actual nuclear energy source. Of course dumping a bunch of photons close to the visible spectrum (UV and IR are not far at all) will not cause anything to fuse on its own - not even if the photons had unceasingly high energies AFAIK.
m-in t1_j06ohmr wrote
Reply to comment by Robo-Connery in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
It’s also worth mentioning what does it mean to be “expensive”: it’s not about numbers in a database in a bank somewhere. It’s about how much energy it takes to make all the stuff that you need for a fusion power plant.
Let’s now imagine that we’ll get to a stage when the first commercial fusion plant can be built
The design, build, and commissioning process of that plant will take about as much energy as that plant will produce through its entire lifetime. It’ll be basically sunk cost for investors just to get the design and operating process shaken down and ready for the next build. And that’s optimistic.
High tech plants like that take hundreds of thousands of man-hours of work, if not millions. While that work is going on, you’re spending resources just to feed and keep the workforce happy - a gross oversimplification, but think of how many resources it takes to run the equivalent of a large residential subdivision. That’s just to keep those people alive and happy so they can do their 8 hours of work per workday. And those people live across the planet pretty much, since many different industries will be providing raw materials, machining, design, assembly, and a host of other services.
As the technology advances and more plants are built, it’ll become profitable to operate one. Not the first one. Not the second one either.
*Happy workforce is a relative term and I’m far from claiming working people everywhere are happy with their jobs. What we should strive for, though, is for big projects to contribute to workers’ well-being everywhere in some way.
m-in t1_j06nfmm wrote
Reply to comment by sw_faulty in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
Given how inefficient it is to feed people with animal products - yeah, knee jerk downvoters got something to think about first.
m-in t1_iyncrjk wrote
Reply to comment by insaneintheblain in A new study based on 22 FOI requests of over 11,000 pages found that Coca-Cola exerts direct influence on academic institutions and organizations that convene major public health conferences and events, and makes payments directly to speakers and researchers conditional on media interviews. by Meatrition
I agree. Reading papers with understanding is real work, at least in disciplines I’m interested in (engineering-related mostly).
m-in t1_iym3vc0 wrote
Reply to comment by insaneintheblain in A new study based on 22 FOI requests of over 11,000 pages found that Coca-Cola exerts direct influence on academic institutions and organizations that convene major public health conferences and events, and makes payments directly to speakers and researchers conditional on media interviews. by Meatrition
It’s not only about thinking. It’s also about access to information. A lot of science is behind paywalls. Not everyone is a student or lives close to a campus to get access to papers “for free”. I go to campus biweekly just to download IEEE papers I need. Had I had to buy those at list price, it’d have been hundreds of dollars each month. I graduated almost 2 decades ago.
m-in t1_j5h4se1 wrote
Reply to comment by Crash4654 in TIFU by washing my hooha with Dr. Bronner’s Tea Tree Castile Soap giving myself a chemical burn by aquakitty99
A matter of degree of course :)