js1138-2

js1138-2 t1_j58dcbh wrote

Here’s a clue. I do a lot of searches for hardware and parts. When I find a website with a good static home page, I bookmark it. When I find a site that wiggles too much on the home page, I leave immediately.

Hope you can capture that.

You have one half second to fully display the home page, or I’m gone.

After that I’m a bit more forgiving.

1

js1138-2 t1_j58af2p wrote

Am I allowed to say that I hate websites that exhibit slow performance that seem to be the result of processing something other than my menu choices.

I leave the site and never return. I return to sites that enable snappy searches for stuff.

1

js1138-2 t1_j0n4ugs wrote

That’s hard to study, because the most vulnerable people are also the most vaccinated. But, when omicron had its first enormous peak, most of the people hospitalized were unvaccinated.

Now it’s hard to find anyone who is neither vaccinated nor a survivor.

1

js1138-2 t1_j0jx1is wrote

Maybe my reading comprehension is deficient, but it looks to me like the article implies omicron is less deadly because it doesn’t attack the lungs as severely. This is counter to the headline.

Also, the article was written shortly after omicron appeared, and we now have a year of experience with it.

The death rate around the world for the last six months has been the lowest for any six month period, and doesn’t seem to be rising with winter.

The question remains, is this because the disease has changed, or because people have adapted. Perhaps after a non-fatal infection, the immune system no longer goes into storm mode.

Or perhaps the most vulnerable people have already died.

6