goj-145
goj-145 t1_j9xlw7x wrote
1 out of 2 hit rate for half million dollar seeking missiles versus a balloon... What a joke
goj-145 t1_j83801h wrote
Reply to comment by 2blazen in [D] Is it legal to use images or videos with copyright to train a model? by Tlaloc-Es
It would have been MUCH harder to prove if they spent a day preprocessing the images first!
goj-145 t1_j831dqg wrote
Reply to comment by Miguel33Angel in [D] Is it legal to use images or videos with copyright to train a model? by Tlaloc-Es
The question is can you use copyrighted info to train a model. The answer is we don't know yet.
The current lawsuit that will define precedent on this is for image generation using copyrighted Getty images in a training model. It's proven that Getty images are used because the watermark shows up in the output of the model many times which is the answer to "how can they prove it".
Once that is defined, then we will know if it is legal or not in those jurisdictions. And then we will get to the "do we do it anyways even though it's illegal?"
goj-145 t1_j80xlao wrote
Reply to comment by Tlaloc-Es in [D] Is it legal to use images or videos with copyright to train a model? by Tlaloc-Es
Not really hard when the model is spitting out watermarked images.
goj-145 t1_j80ufu1 wrote
We're going to find out soon with the Getty lawsuit. Until then, gray area.
goj-145 t1_izf2i1s wrote
Reply to comment by 647843267a in [OC] Guns in the US and Canada by pigecoin69420
Uh that's my point. So your accident doesn't count towards anything. Now look at number of traffic accidents per year statistically. None of yours have ever been counted. Of you had those accidents almost anywhere else in the world they'd be counted.
goj-145 t1_izeazv5 wrote
Reply to comment by 65022056 in [OC] Guns in the US and Canada by pigecoin69420
Generalizing a single country based on repeated and verifiable evidence versus other countries generally not acting in the same way, is valid data.
It's getting to the point where the Americans need their own sub to continue spreading their misinformation.
goj-145 t1_izeas6r wrote
Reply to comment by 647843267a in [OC] Guns in the US and Canada by pigecoin69420
It's not all definitional. It's literally refusing to report or release figures that would be included in such crime statistics. Often because the police are "overloaded" which is BS.
For example for something random that is part of a statistical issue, in the US it is common for vehicle accidents NOT to be reported in the winter because many areas have statutes where police will not come to a scene and issue a ticket or even police report if the weather is bad. More and more commonly the definition has moved to basically any day with any weather because it's more profitable to give out speeding tickets than write accident reports.
You are then supposed to call and report but it's useless as it wasn't at the time and doesn't actually count to any of the statistics involving auto accidents.
Coincidentally the rate of auto accidents in the winter in most of these areas plummeted! Look how safe!
This is ILLEGAL in most places. It is illegal in the US too, but it doesn't matter because murica.
goj-145 t1_ize8fxc wrote
Reply to [OC] Guns in the US and Canada by pigecoin69420
Lol
Now go look up what constitutes various crimes and reporting in Canada vs the US.
You'll see a huge difference where the US doesn't classify a lot of things and Canada does.
This is a common fallacy Americans fall into because they assume everyone reports X the same way they do. And almost always Americans suck at reporting data because there's no cohesive system or set of rules.
goj-145 t1_j9yw9sl wrote
Reply to comment by ferrel_hadley in [OC] Cost of Taking Down Unidentified Object Over Lake Huron by Metalytiq
The world is laughing at the US. Especially when the US also uses high altitude balloon surveillance. Going nuts and shooting down high school science projects, rushing to military action for everything, it's the perfect American story.