floofer-roofer

floofer-roofer OP t1_iy5xiul wrote

No, but genuinely it is not stated anywhere obvious as a possibility or even as a bad thing to do. I didn’t know until 3 hours ago when the other commenter said it was in the fine print. Most of the places where it’s describing this service, it either phrased it as there’s no limit, or that there was a limit that’s now being waived via reimbursement of any fees. No indication it is bad practice unless you happen to read the fine print.

0

floofer-roofer OP t1_iy5a5o7 wrote

I thought I saw somewhere it’s been around since COVID, so I thought it has been around for a year or more. I guess my confusion is that sure it says that in the fine print, but in the more obvious definition of the program it has a different tune about using it…so I’m wondering, which is it?

1

floofer-roofer OP t1_iy58h72 wrote

Is there any reason to actually follow this? Is this something people have experienced?

The message I get on the website about it says “Due to federal regulation changes, we’re currently not applying limits, and we are temporarily refunding fees associated with such withdrawals and transfers”. This reads as if there isn’t a limit and its not frowned upon to transfer as much as you’d like.

0