fail-deadly-
fail-deadly- t1_j6267e9 wrote
Reply to comment by Holyvigil in Access to modern military technology substantially reduces the probability of democratisation of authoritarian regimes — New details about the spread of 29 ground-breaking military technologies in all independent states from 1820 to 2010, as well as the form of government in these states by marketrent
But America has banned nearly almost weapon that America itself has/does/will arm militias with around the world. Things like machine guns, grenades, mortars, light rocket launchers, recoilless rifles, anti-tank guided missiles, and occasionally shoulder fired surface-to-air missiles are all common weapons the U.S. government supplies to militias that fight against our enemies (even if the militia itself is not our friend). Those things are all strictly controlled in the U.S. If the average American citizen goes down to the nearest federal courthouse and asks the government to not just allow you to purchase a couple dozen stinger and Javelin missiles, but asks them for the form where U.S. government provides them to you and your local militia for free, they will either be arrested or laughed out of the building.
It's funny because in the Constitution and in the Federalist papers the framers thought it would be some extremely consequential and soul searching debates and votes about to authorized armies for more than two years at a time. Along with the local militia being about as capable as the standing Army, and in most cases they would do all the defending the country needed without even needing to raise a standing army.
Hamilton in Federalist in Federalist 26 makes two interesting points, basically that if Congress and the president conspire together for years to build a security apparatus capable of defeating liberty, then representative democracy should be replaced by getting as close to direct democracy with no delegation to representatives.
>An army, so large as seriously to menace those liberties, could only be formed by progressive augmentations; which would suppose, not merely a temporary combination between the legislature and executive, but a continued conspiracy for a series of time. Is it probable that such a combination would exist at all? Is it probable that it would be persevered in, and transmitted along through all the successive variations in a representative body, which biennial elections would naturally produce in both houses? Is it presumable, that every man, the instant he took his seat in the national Senate or House of Representatives, would commence a traitor to his constituents and to his country? Can it be supposed that there would not be found one man, discerning enough to detect so atrocious a conspiracy, or bold or honest enough to apprise his constituents of their danger? If such presumptions can fairly be made, there ought at once to be an end of all delegated authority. The people should resolve to recall all the powers they have heretofore parted with out of their own hands, and to divide themselves into as many States as there are counties, in order that they may be able to manage their own concerns in person.
Also, he basically says that if a situation is so dangerous in the world that it requires the creation of a military capable of being a hazard to its liberty then you're screwed.
>Few persons will be so visionary as seriously to contend that military forces ought not to be raised to quell a rebellion or resist an invasion; and if the defense of the community under such circumstances should make it necessary to have an army so numerous as to hazard its liberty, this is one of those calamities for which there is neither preventative nor cure.
fail-deadly- t1_j613vkt wrote
Reply to comment by murderedbyaname in The implementation of a soft drinks industry levy in the UK in 2018 was associated with an 8% reduction in obesity among 10-11 year old girls with the greatest reductions seen in those living in the most deprived areas. No such association was found in 10-11 year old boys or younger children. by shiruken
Maybe it’s easier for poor families to say no to girls when they want the sugar.
fail-deadly- t1_j308wny wrote
Reply to comment by Accidental-Genius in How many animals do you eat in your lifetime? by ImplementAny4362
There was this Greek restaurant that I used to live close to that had a good goat gyro. I liked it quite a bit. Lamb, I wasn't very fond of, but I haven't had it much.
Bison burgers are awesome though.
fail-deadly- t1_j3083t1 wrote
Reply to comment by Accidental-Genius in How many animals do you eat in your lifetime? by ImplementAny4362
Conversely, I have never eaten a duck. I don't see any goats or sheep on the list graphic, and I have had both goat and lamb in my life.
Also, no bison on the list graphic.
EDIT: Deer should be on the list graphic, as well as fish and shellfish.
EDIT 2: While the graphic visualizing the animals does not have it, the website discusses sheep, goats, bison, as well as saying Americans eat 16 pounds of seafood per year on average, which includes 4 pounds of shrimp. Deer are not mentioned.
fail-deadly- t1_j2z3td7 wrote
Reply to comment by ThatDoesNotRefute in In December SpaceX launched the Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite for NASA and CNES. It will survey nearly all the water on Earth. by EricFromOuterSpace
Well if you have a 15 acre swimming pool, which the apparently the smallest lake it can see, maybe you deserve to have it taxed.
fail-deadly- t1_j2x3ql6 wrote
Reply to comment by TheLianeonProject in They say we're past "social media" and are now in the age of algorithms: the "recommendation media." by retepretepretep
Stickiest content, the stuff you’re most likely to overconsume, ads and all.
fail-deadly- t1_j230o0l wrote
Reply to comment by khwaled in [OC] Defence budgets around the world by giteam
Often it was the U.S. supplying both the weapons and the training, but Pakistan, China, and Iran were all involved too.
fail-deadly- t1_j208pfd wrote
Reply to comment by ssaaff in [OC] Defence budgets around the world by giteam
The North Vietnam had tanks, artillery, surface-to-air missiles and even jet fighters, much supplied by the USSR and PRC.
The Afghans had weapons supplied by the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan. The stinger surface-to-air missiles sent by the U.S. were as sophisticated as any of the Soviet weapons.
Don’t act like simple rice farmers were using SA-2s they slapped together in their fields to shoot down B-52s.
fail-deadly- t1_j205od3 wrote
Reply to comment by SodaWithoutSparkles in [OC] Defence budgets around the world by giteam
Even discount the larger U.S. economy, because we’re trying to project force around the world it is FAR more expensive than just trying to defend U.S. soil.
fail-deadly- t1_j1yl4a9 wrote
Reply to Can anyone give me some good book recommendations? Post apocalyptic/dystopian? by ihateredditmodzz
If you haven’t read the classics I’d recommend Alas Babylon and the The Postman.
fail-deadly- t1_j1wuwno wrote
Big thing is nobody has tested transferring cryogenic fuel in microgravity, and the testing on the monopropellants have just been small scale. In order for SpaceX’s starship to work it will have to prove this can work to some extent.
Also, about half the propellant used on a mission is getting to low Earth orbit. Here is a map that shows how much delta V a mission needs to get to places in the solar system. https://imgur.io/SqdzxzF?r
fail-deadly- t1_j1teith wrote
Reply to comment by Rombledore in Robots Are Replacing Workers Lost in the Pandemic. They're Here to Stay. by jormungandrsjig
I don’t think UBI will work, when most labor has little value. Money currently is used to simplify exchanging items of value; however, if 50-75% of people have no value to exchange, except what comes from UBI, I think it causes the monetary system to buckle.
fail-deadly- t1_izpjn9e wrote
I am assuming the high number of UFO sightings in CA is a mixture of lots of people, and a decent amount of Air Force bases.
fail-deadly- t1_iyyn2fm wrote
Reply to comment by creativemind11 in U.S. Space Force chief: The use of space technology in Ukraine ‘is what we can expect in the future’ by Corbulo2526
I think if it ever happened, they would be in highly eccentric orbits with the perigee close to likely targets.
fail-deadly- t1_iyxtw6h wrote
Reply to comment by Jaded_Prompt_15 in [OC] Building permits (in housing units) per capita, by state (fix) by born_in_cyberspace
Also, this map bears a striking resemblance to the state population change 2020 map you can find here
https://public.tableau.com/views/PopulationChange2020/Dashboard1?
The states losing population seem to correspond to brown or yellow areas and the states gaining population seem to correspond to the teal and green areas.
fail-deadly- t1_iw2b31m wrote
Reply to comment by oioioifuckingoi in The effect of the First World War on names, in France [OC] by bjco
France had a single 24 hour period in August 1914 where it had more than 25,000 troops killed, and it only had a population of 41 million.
I mean Russia seems to be absolutely pissing away Soldiers lives in its current war, but there doesn’t seem to be anything close to that day’s losses, and Russia has a population of more than 140 million people.
fail-deadly- t1_iuzduk3 wrote
Reply to comment by wtfbro_ in What factors contribute to gas prices? [OC] by USAFacts_Official
What kind of ludicrous conspiracy theory is that?
It is obviously a dial so they can move prices up and down at will, and not a button.
fail-deadly- t1_isre9ff wrote
Reply to comment by icouldbworknow in NASA outlines case for making sole-source SLS award to Boeing-Northrop joint venture by jeffsmith202
Well 100% of people who taken a breath will die, but I don’t consider breathing hazardous.
fail-deadly- t1_j7c8wgk wrote
Reply to comment by r2k-in-the-vortex in What weak signals or drivers of change—that receive limited attention today—are most likely to create signifiant impacts over the next 10-20 years? Where are the black swans hiding? by NewDiscourse
>Decline in religiosity. There is a steep age gradient in religiosity in all countries and all cultures. As the older more religious generations die off that will result in significant societal and policy changes worldwide. That trend is only accelerating, woowoo is going the way of the dodo.
Political ideology is quickly replacing it. Many people want to be good, moral people, who belong to something bigger than themselves, and based on their values - which is extremely subjective - making the world a "better" place.