delusions-

delusions- t1_jcbz6mf wrote

> we were A LOT more mature than the youth of today is.

rofl yeah ok

> we were A LOT more mature than the youth of today is... considering they eat tide pods for views on the internet....

and ya'll threw lawn darts at each other just for fun

You're out of your mind if you think any generation is significantly different than the other in terms of "maturity", other than the last 3 not having as much lead poisoning so are significantly less prone to being a piece of shit

4

delusions- t1_jcbz1gr wrote

Yeah nah, I'll contribute directly to the candidates before I do to a nameless faceless organization that says "Your contribution will support candidates who are running to oppose the return of the racially motivated book ban .... and to give our students the world-class education they deserve."

so there's 0 way to follow where the actual money goes?

2

delusions- t1_jcbvkqn wrote

You're saying a whole lot of nothing while implying everything.

>These problems arise when Districts want to co opt the definition of 'parent' for themselves.

What's this mean to you? > Child welfare is the care of the parents

Wwwwwhat

>I'm just saying there should be distinct areas of separation.

No you're not "just saying" anything. Just like no one "just asks questions"

15