deep-yearning
deep-yearning t1_je9qqrf wrote
Reply to comment by viertys in [D] Improvements/alternatives to U-net for medical images segmentation? by viertys
Accuracy is not a good metric here given the large number of true negative pixels you will get.
How large is the typical region you are trying to segment (in pixels)? If you've already done data augmentation I would also try to generate images if you can. Use a larger batch size, try different optimizers and a learning rate scheduler. How many images do not have cavities in them?
deep-yearning t1_je710wy wrote
What accuracy (Dice?) are you getting? 100 training images is pretty small. Have you tried cross-validation?
deep-yearning t1_je4zmdc wrote
Reply to "[D]" Is wandb.ai worth using? by frodo_mavinchotil
Yes it's worth using.
deep-yearning t1_jb7rxhg wrote
Reply to comment by BreakingCiphers in [D] I’m a Machine Learning Engineer for FAANG companies. What are some places looking for freelance / contract work for ML? by doctorjuice
What's Upwork?
Nm you?
Gottem
deep-yearning t1_jb625mr wrote
Reply to [R] RWKV (100% RNN) can genuinely model ctx4k+ documents in Pile, and RWKV model+inference+generation in 150 lines of Python by bo_peng
Attention is all you want, but not all you need
deep-yearning t1_j4qesyy wrote
It's best use is as an assistant, provided it is accurate. So far in my tests it has been pretty good at writing boilerplate code and email/letter templates. Better than githubs copilot for code.
deep-yearning t1_isxpazd wrote
Reply to comment by nmkd in [D] Imagic Stable Diffusion training in 11 GB VRAM with diffusers and colab link. by 0x00groot
Automatic1111's webui runs in linux or windows
deep-yearning t1_isxlgw1 wrote
Reply to [D] Imagic Stable Diffusion training in 11 GB VRAM with diffusers and colab link. by 0x00groot
paging Automatic1111
pls implement in webui
deep-yearning t1_isfpzaa wrote
Reply to comment by tdgros in [D] Interpolation in medical imaging? by Delacroid
No, the problem is impairing them
deep-yearning t1_je9te4j wrote
Reply to comment by viertys in [D] Improvements/alternatives to U-net for medical images segmentation? by viertys
Train locally on your own machine if you have a GPU, or try using google colab if you don't. Google Colab has V100 which should fit larger batch sizes.
To be honest, given how limited the data set is and how small some of the segmentation masks are, I am not sure other architectures will be able to do any better than U-Net.
I would also try the nnU-Net which should give state-of-the-art performance, and so will give you a good idea of what's possible with the dataset that you have: https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet