d-a-v-e-
d-a-v-e- t1_ix3ggoq wrote
After 8.5 hours of work and 2x 30minutes of standing in a train, I need to sit on my butt first. Not everyone has a job that is relaxing as yours is.
d-a-v-e- t1_iv5eiit wrote
Reply to comment by byllz in Why don't we have Neandertal mitochondrial DNA? by nodeciapalabras
Meaning: neanderthal and sapiens mitochondrial dna could be very similar?
d-a-v-e- t1_iv5e7ws wrote
Reply to comment by scottish_beekeeper in Why don't we have Neandertal mitochondrial DNA? by nodeciapalabras
Or it was socially, rather than biologically. The two species never mixed. The Neanderthals men could defend their women, and the women could defend themselves very well against sapiens men. But Neanderthal men however, did impregnate sapiens women.
d-a-v-e- t1_ixsalu5 wrote
Reply to comment by scottish_beekeeper in Why don't we have Neandertal mitochondrial DNA? by nodeciapalabras
I've been thinking some more about this. There weren't that many Neanderthals. The population size varied around 10.000, 70.000 tops.
For sapiens, in those times, it was likely similar.
So that makes interbreeding even more rare. It wasn't like they met each other a lot. So this means that it happened only one time that interbreeding happened and was successful in the sense that it produced offspring that reproduced for millennia.
So regardless of what possible biological outcomes are, rare events can produce odd results even if there were more possibilities that could have happened too.
I also read about evidence that this interbreeding could have happend way earlier than previously thought, and that the neanderthals that spread through Europe were already a human neanderthal hybrid. This could have been a one time event, rather than a series of events.