Vivid-Construction93

Vivid-Construction93 t1_j34zvqp wrote

Ehhh i understand that to a degree on the lawbreakers end but i think i mostly understand your sentiment. As far as the knife id say that also very much depends on the knife and your argument involving a bordering required circumstance of getting the underhook theres not much stopping you from catching a blade to the throat or another vital area

1

Vivid-Construction93 t1_j34saft wrote

Id argue the knife statement a bit but thats not what id say is the root of the discussion. Things im curious about is the previous mental health calls that came out in the news and what was the cause/outcome and the toxicology report just for the small chance this teenager was under the influence of a substances capable of allowing him to push through a taser

1

Vivid-Construction93 t1_j34hj2p wrote

I mean i did a little tldr on this but yes they are grown men and physically capable of taking this kid down especially if they communicate well and use distractions but all it really takes is one lucky shot with the knife for him to kill at least one of them. Then what? either way someone dies? There more than likely was a better option to be chosen it just clearly wasnt.

2