Vescape-Eelocity

Vescape-Eelocity t1_j4qetrs wrote

The article says the results were independent of socioeconomic status, so they apparently controlled for that, but I'm still a bit suspicious too because we already know that wealth literally improves every aspect of a person's life already.

I think I'd have a fair amount of skepticism unless they proved the direct causal relationship, or maybe if they were still able to find the same correlation when looking at poor rural families and wealthy inner city families without many green areas (I feel like this is rare for wealthy people, but it does exist). I feel like controlling for things like diet, exercise, etc would be extremely difficult in that case too.

68

Vescape-Eelocity t1_iz1unei wrote

Interesting, but the sample size is very small and they only processed the most talkative few hours a day from each 16 hour daily recording. I'm a little surprised they didn't seem to incorporate how often children were spoken to, rather just what happened in the most talkative moments, which were around 1/8 to 1/4ish of the day each day.

Cool preliminary findings, but this needs way more intensive studies to determine anything with confidence.

9