Vaushist-Yangist
Vaushist-Yangist t1_je1ytu6 wrote
Reply to comment by HappilyPartnered in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
The lottery, like gov spending continues to pay out.
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdz3sms wrote
Reply to More than 800,000 New Jerseyans to receive ANCHOR rebate checks by direct deposit Tuesday by ROI-NJ
Love the cash relief but I wish the gov would do more to help out the poor and homeless. They miss out a lot even though they need the help the most
NJ is amongst the worst for inequality, yet amongst the richest of all states including DC. Our state could be thriving much more without the threat of poverty
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdxdi0r wrote
Reply to comment by HappilyPartnered in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Can you tell me what tomorrow’s lottery numbers are too?
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdr2uqd wrote
Reply to comment by HappilyPartnered in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
You don’t know that! 😁
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdpptrp wrote
Reply to comment by YawnTractor_1756 in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Then that’s not selling for 400k, that’s 400k + extra labor
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdpm313 wrote
Reply to comment by Vaushist-Yangist in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Something else I like is to ensure an economic safety net for all New Jersey citizens, by raising funds from a carbon, inheritance, and data tax to add on to the dividends I’ve previously mentioned. Lots of academics agree that all of these are useful and meaningful taxes to fund dividends to ensure the population has enough funds to best adapt to changing environmental and economic environments.
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdoy71z wrote
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdoy53d wrote
Reply to comment by WaltO in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
It may be state-owned, but the benefits are publicly owned because they are gifted out as checks every year
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdnho2g wrote
Reply to comment by KaliGracious in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
No problem! Thanks for the interest! Georgism is actually pretty compatible with a lot of schools of thought
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdnebkr wrote
Reply to comment by KaliGracious in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Funny enough this idea is actually Georgist and is American af 🇺🇸🦅 Henry George was actually born in Philly and died in NYC so all the more reasons to respect him, especially here in NJ 😎
Vaushist-Yangist t1_jdn7j4m wrote
Reply to Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Any extra taxed revenue that is raised by tourism in NJ should be given back to NJ citizens. This is our land and we all collectively use it, that means we should all collectively reap the benefits. This can be done with a land value tax + value added tax and distribute those funds equally to all NJ citizens. Alaska does this by sending out checks to their citizens with the funds raised from oil production, and it’s been very beneficial for them.
Vaushist-Yangist t1_j591l5i wrote
They’re also trying to tax it to fund some social programs, which, fine, but we also have to invest in local production if we want to keep it affordable and to keep people buying it
Vaushist-Yangist t1_je6vch3 wrote
Reply to comment by HappilyPartnered in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
Not if you know the future like you do!