The-Temple-Of-Iron

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j27z5j2 wrote

Reply to comment by triffid_hunter in What is our current "best guess" about how to observers that entered a black hole on opposite sides would look to each other once they crossed the event horizon? by WittyUnwittingly

Temperature is a measurement of vibrations in particles essentially. That is wholly dependent on time passing. Mathematically time stops in a singularity. If that is so then, in my incredibly layman-style interpretation, Temperature is physically the same as absolute 0 K. Would you like to explain what you mean? I love learning. I'm very curious. Or you can make condescending statements, or rather half-statements, without providing any explanation and then downvoting my curiosity. Your choice, I suppose, but I was eager to see an intelligent conversation on this. You have offered no conversation nor any intelligence. I would enjoy it if you did.

1

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j27rr6l wrote

Reply to comment by triffid_hunter in What is our current "best guess" about how to observers that entered a black hole on opposite sides would look to each other once they crossed the event horizon? by WittyUnwittingly

I wonder if the concept of time in a singularity affecting the temperature/energy of those particles may play a hand in solving this? I'm keen on science but took me 3 tries to pass algebra so take that with a big grain of sodium chloride :-)

0

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j25w7er wrote

Reply to comment by Kooky_Performance116 in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]

Haha well to be fair we know just about beyond a doubt what happened from the first fraction of a second "after" the "big bang". But before that is just guessing. Some hypothesis suggest that a black hole is the beginning of a universe. A universe and a black hole are seemingly mathematically and physically the same thing in many ways. There is a great space time video on this I think.

1

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j25tm1v wrote

Reply to comment by Opus-the-Penguin in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]

Not exactly. So the universe is expanding. Think of it as we aren't moving but everything is getting further away. That's an oversimplification, but the big bang was our universe kind of coming into being. We didn't move from a center. We are in a point that is really big now.

1

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j25hubf wrote

Reply to If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]

The inflationary universe theory predicts that the universe came into being and inflated in a manner that you can't look in a specific location to see where it happened. It happened everywhere. Existence as you know it began at that moment and it happened throughout the universe. So as far back as you can see is the radiation from about 400,000 years after the initial inflation occurred, called the cosmic microwave background. So far it seems unlikely that we can see earlier than that. Seeing before the big bang is a paradoxical question. As far as we know, time began at the big bang. There was no before.

Edit: Brotherbrutha's comment below corrected the timing for me.

46

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_j21t2as wrote

Reply to Question About Life Beyond Earth by HealingKami

Oxygen produced by the first life this planet had for over 2 billion years was a waste byproduct. And the amount of oxygen it put off actually caused the first of the 5 major extinctions the planet has seen, which then made it possible for life that required oxygen to flourish.

We aren't looking for oxygen to prove life per say, but for certain elements which if in certain amounts with combination of other elements would indicate a strong suggestion of life.

Hope that helps.

Edit: Oh, also, almost forgot: it is believed by some that the overabundance of oxygen in our atmosphere helped accelerate the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs due to the atmosphere being volatile and susceptible to longer hotter fires. Oxygen is garbage lol

22

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_ivh4b50 wrote

Reply to Who would move to Mars? by Navstar27

I have 4 young kids and the military messed me up. I'm out. Besides, if i can't hike in my mountains and breath fresh air, I'm checkin out. Let me know when Mars has fresh air on their mountains.

1

The-Temple-Of-Iron t1_itxoitn wrote

Reply to Will NASA discover the principles of UFOs? by NeuroptimusPrime

Man oh man. You're using a lot of terms without knowing their definition nor their value. Eye witness testimony is literally the worst form of evidence, btw. Hence UFO folk are usually very unintelligent weirdos that have more in common with schizophrenics during the height of a relapse than a scientist who knows the value of evidence and verifiable objective proof.

9