Tall-Log-1955

Tall-Log-1955 t1_jc75iwj wrote

That's not true. Climate change is getting worse, but aside from that most things are actually getting better. The past was a terrible place to live.

Modern tech has just made it much much easier for bad news to get to you

The world is terrible but it's better than it used to be and it can still get better:

https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better

3

Tall-Log-1955 t1_iu2eaz5 wrote

If race is actually predictive of interest in a product, I don't think it's that bad. Is it sexist to less often show tampon ads to men? Is it ageist to less often show ads for toys to senior citizens?

If people of a given race are genuinely not interested in a product, I don't think it harms them to show them the ads less often.

1

Tall-Log-1955 t1_iu26rpu wrote

These algorithms don't have that problem because they show ads to everyone in small amounts. Then whichever demographic/group engages at the highest rate, they show to more people like that.

You can read how they work here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-armed_bandit

1

Tall-Log-1955 t1_iu1u7p6 wrote

I think that if the reason is that non-white people did not engage with the ad (because they are not interested in it), then yes it is okay

If the reason is that some property developer wants to keep out non-whites then it is not okay.

1