Still-WFPB

Still-WFPB t1_j2wx3cp wrote

Im not saying 20% is dissapointing just that's where this benchmark for 15-years is.

I dont think other strategies have a significantly better adherence, while they may have similar outcomes.

1

Still-WFPB t1_j2we8m0 wrote

If your interested, read up on the 2012 banting memorial lecture by Roy Taylor, and further reading on the Twin Cycle Hypothesis.

Type-2 diabetes is about adiposity, insulin resistance is a symptom, which carbohydrate reduction (elimination) some would say is not well treated by a low-carb strategy as it merely avoids learning the adaptation and drives further sensitivity to carbohydrates.

2

Still-WFPB t1_j2v3dx7 wrote

In Uni I did a couple research projects on T2D remission using high carbohydrate low fat diet... in the end as I followed the topic for several years thst followed my projects... there's so much research that

Fasting, High carb low fat, Low carb diet, Other intense lifestyle interventions, can all Lead to meaningful remission the big difference and key takeaway here is which if any of these are achievable and reach a sufficient level of compliance.

Eating a restrictive diet involves restrictions which can be difficult in every day situations.

In this study 1-year remission is 75% and 15-year is only 20%...

2