Did you check statistical significance? Humans are bad at eyeballing statistical significance, but it looks borderline to me.

But those are not all banks. If you said recessions then yes

Who says this? If this was the thought there wouldn’t have been a rush to shore things up this week both in the us and credit suisses

How do figure there’s 3 groups over 90 years

The axes don’t mean anything because they are nonlinear combinations of a higher dimensional data set. The only label you could put is x axis, y axis

Was he though? they already had the idea, the contacts, the prototype, the lithium battery expertise. They brought him in to help with funding and he decided he would put in his money and take over the company and force them out. He complained that they set up the production line for the 3 wrong and almost caused bankruptcy, but that was after he forced them out. He set up a horrible process then wants everyone to congratulate him for fixing the mess he created.

That’s clearly false. Since musk took over Twitter Tesla is down like 20% and the market is up

Sure but Tesla and using lithium ion batteries for evs wasn’t his idea so musk wasn’t in any way necessary for that to happen

What does “where they are mean” in this context?

What do you mean Tesla is down 80% more than the ndx this year.

So in the sense of both down then yes.

What is 0/0? Then I can answer

I mean he’s gutted the solar side. He just needed investors to bail out his tanking company

I mean yes if the nas fell 80% farther than it actually did.

Nah Tesla is down 52% ytd nas is down 29%

His foundation works all over the world and not just on “political” issues.

I upvoted because I read this as sarcasm. Don’t make me e regret it

I think the use of buy isn’t that misleading. He signed a legally binding contract to buy twitter. When someone wins a bid to purchase a house they might tell friends they bought a house today even though there are still details to work out.

The on hold is probably wrong, but mostly because that isn’t a thing. Once you sign a legally binding contract you can’t put it on hold.

As far as we know he never profited of his market manipulation of twitter except for in not properly disclosing when he acquired a 5% share in the company.

However, his friends might have if they knew in advance of any of his statements.

I believe that market manipulation is still illegal even if you don’t profit.

Two possibilities (I think it’s the first but could be wrong)

1 in openings the players have run engines to a higher depth so the moves they play are actually better than rerunning the engine on a lower depth

2 players are trying to play off the beaten track into a position they understand better. If you just play top engine move for 15 moves then it isn’t that hard for your opponent to also play top move because they also know the engine line

Edit: to clarify 2 100% happens I just don’t think that’s why the engine eval is wrong