Silver-Ad8136

Silver-Ad8136 t1_jabt0jv wrote

Some people sure have some strange ideas about how businesses do business. I worked at a Corningware store, and while we did have a fair bit of merch in the back, it was the same stuff we had up front, not like...super secret extra good stuff we kept hidden because...idk? We hate money?

1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_ja8rz9t wrote

Your citations don't say what you think they do, that businesses over-order by half, fully expecting the majority of product to be wasted...so to make? More money? Because...science?

0

Silver-Ad8136 t1_ja8o28g wrote

Dude, that's just not how businesses work. Merchants see unsold stock as failure and they cry about it. That shit costs money.

Like really, math that in your head and see if you can balance wasting 30% of stock with another 2, 3 pts (maybe) net.

1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_ja3rusu wrote

Reply to comment by Kawai_Oppai in Ouch by PharaoRamsesII

I guess I see it more as...you went over to Guga's and he made you one of his A5s, and you whip out a bottle of HP sauce. So, sure...it's "wrong" but it's also pretty delicious.

I'd also note, you hear partially with your eyes and 100% with your mind, so if glowing tubes and a VU meter and more boxes and cables, that hot, static smell...appeal, no you can't get that with software.

1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_ja3qhje wrote

Reply to comment by thms0 in Ouch by PharaoRamsesII

It's sort of hard to second guess the engineer studio. All the EQ in the world and the HE1 won't turn old recordings of The Great Gildersleeve into Avatar 2 in Atmos

1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_ja0rsg6 wrote

Reply to comment by croakjob in Ouch by PharaoRamsesII

It's kind of like...a stick shift makes your car more fun to drive, even if you're unlikely to outwit an automatic transmission in a '24 car, really.

3

Silver-Ad8136 t1_j210dar wrote

If you look at RTings, in addition to frequency response there are other objective measurements that can describe headphone performance, and you can maybe learn your own ears and head and how they'd transfer those numbers into the phenomenology of listening...maybe.

It's not perfect, but your other choice is watching Christopher Suede videos and trying to assign meaning to words like thick... ephemeral...euphonic...dark...bright...warm...analytic...fast...tight...velvety

−1

Silver-Ad8136 t1_j1vjxaj wrote

>sn’t it weird how you like Custom wrapped cables that cost $50-120 for no perceived sound quality yet you would call it “sound betta” for people that are willing to spend THE SAME AMOUNT of $$ for perceived quality?

Probably the best investment as far as improving your listening experience is reefer, although there too...is the High Times centerfold really worth more than good ol' Reggie?

1