Any danger that needs to be explained and isn't immediately recognizable isn't a real danger.

People claiming things are dangerous that aren't immediately recognizable as dangerous are only after power and destruction of whatever they claim is dangerous.

Sounds like a nihilist trying to drag down everyone to their level of hopelessness and subjectivity.

Likewise. Meaning stop pushing the shit on children. Nobody is preventing adults from doing what they want. There's a shit ton of people trying to change the way pronouns work, though 🤔

Attempting to force acceptance and recognition for a subjective feeling is not trying to live in peace. It's declaring war on objectivity, and by your language I can see that you replace objectivity with subjectivity which is paradoxical and necessarily makes what is "true" definable by whoever holds the higher amount of power.

That's not a future you'll like, my friend.

Then you should understand the obsession with genitalia of gun grabbers.

Folks in favor of transgenderism as a treatment for gender dysphoria are biophobic.

Like gun grabbers every time they make a reference?

Think he would if I said I had a females penis and he's a bigot if he doesn't?

Sure thing, person who thinks men are women.

Thank you, come again 😁

The AG blocked suits at an audit several times. What do you mean proof?

Nothing like transparency and maintaining public trust. We don't need that for a democracy to be legitimate. Matter of fact, public trust is a threat to democracy!

Idc about Delaware or Wilmington.

And you call Philly well managed?

Fuck that. Give them Philly.

Seems like a weird thing to fixate on. The dudes out of the picture, why are you on his dick?

If the corporation wasn't ordered to pay more for destroying an entire towns water supply than a youtuber for words that led to harassment, then its not justice.

Republicans don't seek absolute conformity the way democrats do. Theres Republicans running ads against people who doubt the 2020 election and are not happy with party leadership. Meanwhile, the democrat messaging is monolithic and mainstream. What the hell are you talking about?

Ok Rachel Maddow

Cooperation and competition go hand in hand (economically) but states should be able to negotiate state concerns. With other states and across nations. The United States was meant to be a consolidation of mini-nations (not exactly, but essentially).

Lol you think we have an operational system of international cooperation?

You mean ideological colonization?

How many countries do we have to bomb into oblivion before it becomes concerning?

Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣 it's self-classification. Hearing that claim in 2022, the age of intersectionalism, is just cringe.

>One evil wants to deny my right to make life or death decisions about my own body.

Lol gross

>The other evil believes black, brown, gay, trans or female people deserve to be treated like people.

... what??

They're both evil.

Shapiro is decidedly a piece of shit. Put me there.

Well, we haven't mentioned any problems yet, so your accusation and argument are based on your imagination.

The only claim I've made is that localities can focus on local problems and provide solutions that centralized government can't... you've yet to refute the claim.

I disagree. I think the more localized solutions are, the better focused they are, and the more autonomy (freedom) is given to the localities.

Everyone likes to say there's a social contract, but nobody likes to take responsibility for their end of it.

Centralization of government is better? Lol