Sad-Principle3781
Sad-Principle3781 t1_jarjh6a wrote
Reply to comment by HEIMDVLLR in SHOCKER: Mayor's private BQE meeting could divide Brooklyn politicians by psychothumbs
you dont' induce demand by making more of that thing. ie: building more cars isn't inducing demand of cars. you can say making new york more desirable to live is inducing demand for housing, but building more housing isn't inducing demand for more housing.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j9sf6so wrote
Reply to comment by Metroncat in FDNY wants to up the cost of ambulance rides by more than 50% by NYY657545
That's hilarious. I'd say look on the bright side. Less people calling an ambulance for frivolous trips or calling a less expensive ride for themselves.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j6oyhdp wrote
Reply to comment by markbass69420 in A Housing Plan for Manhattan’s Empty Spaces by psychothumbs
People always bring that harlem truck depot example, but those voters are voting rationally. They live and vote there, but they wouldn't get be able to afford the newly proposed apartments. What incentive would those voters have to support new construction. You need a new paradigm.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j6ltulo wrote
Reply to comment by Die-Nacht in Driver using a two ton vehicle as a weapon against a cyclist and dog on a cargo bike. 5th avenue near Rockefeller Center in Manhattan. by Souperplex
That's the way it's been for a recent period of time in human development and will probably be the case for the forseeable future. Humans do a lot of insane things.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j6cdts3 wrote
Reply to comment by PostPostMinimalist in Migrants sell $2 candy bars in subway to scrape by by 1600hazenstreet
yea, this is better than the band of migrants who were arrested for shoplifting from Macy's the other day. Let's keep welcoming them in with open arms and see how city and country develops from the influx of people.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j6cdoaq wrote
Reply to comment by yankuniz in NYC is in store for a ‘cold and snowy’ winter, according to Old Farmer’s Almanac by fe2sio4
yup, nobody else is calling out the famer's almanac.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5xu5dn wrote
Reply to comment by The_Lone_Apple in Grand Central Madison goes deep... by mrturdferguson
It would've been cheaper and more efficient to build a pedestrian tunnel connecting the two stations instead.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5n2evf wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in Opinion: NYC’s residential floor area ratio cap must go by ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
constructing a twenty story two hundred unit building for 700 million vs four hundred forty story for two billion. exactly as it sounds. I don't know why you'd assume rich would disappear, I'm not saying it. I'm just saying building taller would require you to build more expensive and it's not the ratio that's holding it back. IT's good to hear you know how economics works for supply in a free market. Now apply it to the constraints of building taller. There's no way you'd get more more taller without dedicating more space to making your building work and make it less efficient.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5m85rz wrote
Reply to comment by George4Mayor86 in Opinion: NYC’s residential floor area ratio cap must go by ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
then go build the transit. what'll likely happen is the housing development gets built and there's no more new transit. The investment in transit in the form of capital projects of tunnels is going to cost more than the building. Nobody is falling over themselves to build housing or it'd already be built with exemptions. The higher it goes the more likely it'll be unaffordable luxury. The types of housing that needs to be built, capital efficient affordable housing isn't being limited by the ratio cap, it's just a dumb opinion piece.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5m5olm wrote
Reply to comment by brownredgreen in Opinion: NYC’s residential floor area ratio cap must go by ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The best way to respond to sarcasm is with more sarcasm and it was sarcasm to beginwith
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5lj81e wrote
Reply to comment by NetQuarterLatte in Opinion: NYC’s residential floor area ratio cap must go by ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The part about the tall height would mean almost certainly it would be luxury. In the best case: yea, it'll be an investment by wealthy foreign owners who would never live there or use any of the building/community services, but probably just as likely it'd be turned into an airbnb listing with a revolving door of new neighbors.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5lhnwy wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in Opinion: NYC’s residential floor area ratio cap must go by ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
sure, if you're into the Idaho amenities. More density here means crowded subways and grocery stores though
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5j2uyr wrote
don't think that's what's holding construction back. most developers won't want to build too high as it'd get progresively more expensive per floor and more footage dedicated to elevators anyway. also packing so much density in a single area would be bad for community resources in the area.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5ig9y3 wrote
Reply to comment by Rob_T_Firefly in Loving the Chinese New Year celebration today in Chinatown!!! by greenthumbnyc
I mean that article is from 2015. Yea, I heard that new immigrants are arriving, but the place is way more disneyland than ten years ago from both the types of stores and the kind of people visiting. Also COVID must've done a number on the neighborhood.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j5ht9mv wrote
Do asian people still live in manhattan Chinatown anymore? Any new immigrants? Every year it seems more tourists and mainstream
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j4x3g97 wrote
Reply to NYC eviction rate continues to rise since ban was lifted, as homelessness surges by flightwaves
maybe the homeless can make use of those migrant camps or hotels the mayor has contracted out for them. It'll help alleviate some of the burden and average out the housing needs of both groups.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j2hi6k0 wrote
Happy New Year Ya'll
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j2ctpxf wrote
Doesn't matter about his past or what he claimed about it. What matters is what he'll do for his constituents going forward
Sad-Principle3781 t1_j12opw2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Monthly Discussion Thread - Month of December, 2022 by AutoModerator
that's peak expensive hotel period. I'd suggest the week right after for less crowds and expenses. If you must come when you want, pick a relative closer area to tourist attractions and next to the subway.
Sad-Principle3781 t1_jd2gjn1 wrote
Reply to comment by Life_Equivalent_2104 in Canals in NYC by Life_Equivalent_2104
i mean duh. canals won't make any sense compared to trains for transportation. they're more fun now but not practical