Representative-Bag89
Representative-Bag89 t1_j1npxsx wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Criticism_1414 in Sam Altam revield capabilites of GPT 4. It'll be Enormous. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Because asking ceos for predictions about their own idea is a recipe for disaster. Self driving cars should be a reality, yet they struggle even in the simplest environment. Life is not as easy as a PowerPoint presentation.
Representative-Bag89 t1_j1no1zu wrote
So much bullshit. Being overly optimistic is just as stupid as refusing to see what is happening. These algos are tools. Just like the calculator didn’t destroy math, (on the contrary), GPT won’t destroy [insert what your want], (on the contrary.)
Representative-Bag89 t1_j1n2svl wrote
Reply to Money Will Kill ChatGPT’s Magic by vernes1978
I will happily pay for gpt-3, maybe with the option of having longer threads
Representative-Bag89 t1_izaxkbz wrote
Live art
Representative-Bag89 t1_j1tnoxd wrote
Reply to comment by QuietOil9491 in I finished writing and designing a Children Story Book with Chat GPT and Stable Diffusion in Less than 6 Hours by sdas11111
Spot on. Now people will write a 20 word prompt and feel they are artist. What good is technological advance if humans keep being lazy and egocentric?