Harm mitigation is not the same as lack of harm.

Educate yourself on simple logic and human communication friend. You can argue that logging is a necessity and better than alternatives while still recognizing that there are many aspects of it which are harmful to the environment.

I eat meat and I can argue that eating chicken is better for the environment than eating beef, but it's still problematic.

>Should rural properties only use helicopters to travel

Rural properties should be largely unsubsidized. The cities largely pay for all those roads, communication services, trash, water, utilities, etc, because some people like the lifestyle. I didn't grow up in a big city. I know that most small town folk are NOT engaged in farming/logging/mining. They can stay there all they want but I'm sick of paying for them to live unsustainably.

That doesn't make them not a problem. And all that chemical runoff isn't peachy either

The roads are also a problem no matter what you do

Moulde on ye rye