Ok-Mine1268
Ok-Mine1268 t1_j27b6uk wrote
Reply to comment by Impossible_Sir6196 in The Witcher and the Lesser of Two Evils by ADefiniteDescription
Isn’t that the whole story model of the Witcher? Omg you to have to choose but don’t worry either choice will result in some horrible outcome. See! Hahaha we got you!
Ok-Mine1268 t1_j1djmq4 wrote
Thanks. I won’t sleep tonight.
Ok-Mine1268 t1_iyhmxvn wrote
Reply to comment by Repulsive_Pound_714 in [ Removed by Reddit ] by Repulsive_Pound_714
HR killed this dudes dog.
Ok-Mine1268 t1_iyhmt70 wrote
Reply to comment by NeverAdopted in [ Removed by Reddit ] by Repulsive_Pound_714
Nope
Ok-Mine1268 t1_iy5is52 wrote
Reply to My oil painting and the model by NoahVerrier
Looks great!
Ok-Mine1268 t1_ivc2nwy wrote
Reply to comment by wavegeekman in Michael Shermer argues that science can determine many of our moral values. Morality is aimed at protecting certain human desires, like avoidance of harm (e.g. torture, slavery). Science helps us determine what these desires are and how to best achieve them. by Ma3Ke4Li3
They seem to barricade themselves in these systems preventing them from synthesizing.
Ok-Mine1268 t1_ivc0jlf wrote
Reply to comment by Empigee in Michael Shermer argues that science can determine many of our moral values. Morality is aimed at protecting certain human desires, like avoidance of harm (e.g. torture, slavery). Science helps us determine what these desires are and how to best achieve them. by Ma3Ke4Li3
Very interesting…
Ok-Mine1268 t1_ivbupge wrote
Reply to Michael Shermer argues that science can determine many of our moral values. Morality is aimed at protecting certain human desires, like avoidance of harm (e.g. torture, slavery). Science helps us determine what these desires are and how to best achieve them. by Ma3Ke4Li3
Does anyone take Michael Shermer serious as a philosopher? He defines himself as a skeptic probably because he is still recovering from leaving evangelicalism. I’d guess his whole purpose of arguing that morality can be determined by science to me is still just a reaction to his Xevangelic identity. I’m not even saying I disagree with him but wearing an identity too strongly doesn’t seem to help one’s epistemology.
Ok-Mine1268 t1_j6g6dwn wrote
Reply to comment by D_Welch in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
Does not being able to define precisely thought or consciousness mean we look at any chat bot and say ‘dang, that thing could be self aware!’? If someone can’t prove my Casio G-shock isn’t sentient should I start wondering if it is? Oddly enough it makes me think of an atheist debater say, ‘if you can’t prove a magical wish granting pony doesn’t exist than you should probably start worshiping it.’ (mocking theists) Paraphrasing, but some of these posts about chatbots and other AI are beginning to sound just as ridiculous.