Ok-Farmer-2695
Ok-Farmer-2695 t1_ispsani wrote
Reply to comment by zakkdakiller1 in PsBattle: Erling Haaland getting kicked in the nuts. by knowshon
When you see a limping gazelle, you go in for the kill. I wouldn’t expect you to understand, but it’s called being alpha.
Ok-Farmer-2695 t1_ir482m8 wrote
Reply to comment by RockstarArtisan in Interactive sketches to illustrate SOLID programming principles by trekhleb
… no?
Ok-Farmer-2695 t1_ir3rcc9 wrote
Reply to comment by Amythyst34 in See lifelike facial reconstructions of a medieval Scottish woman, priest and bishop by unheated1
Thanks for the link. It was interesting, and it says the reconstructions are just approximations.
> Markers indicate the depths of tissue to be added to the skull (a cast in this case). Studies over the past century of males and females of different ancestral groups determine the measures of these depths.
> The finished product only approximates actual appearance because the cranium does not reflect soft-tissue details (eye, hair, and skin color; facial hair; the shape of the lips; or how much fat tissue covers the bone). Yet a facial reconstruction can put a name on an unidentified body in a modern forensic case.
How they go from approximation to identifying bodies goes unexplained, but I’d guess they use other circumstantial data, like “Hey a Caucasian male hiker in his 20s went missing in this area 50 years ago and this fits the bill.”
Ok-Farmer-2695 t1_ir3izen wrote
Reply to comment by PurpleAntifreeze in See lifelike facial reconstructions of a medieval Scottish woman, priest and bishop by unheated1
Source?
Ok-Farmer-2695 t1_iu2wkdz wrote
Reply to comment by Less_Noisy in Beyond Catastrophe: A New Climate Reality Is Coming Into View by lightscameracrafty
Except Redditors, right? You can always count on absolute certainty when asking a Redditor, especially if the prediction is Armageddon.