Not_n_A-Hole_usually

Not_n_A-Hole_usually t1_j6dhdkt wrote

It’s a short article. Some of you should read it before reacting. His “domestic incident” was him pushing a woman. Sounds like he pushed her exactly once. She happened to fall but did not require medical attention. For all we know she went after him and he simply pushed her away and this was the end result. He didn’t beat the shit out of her so he shouldn’t be compared to some who should rightfully be called out.

2

Not_n_A-Hole_usually t1_izza3gl wrote

Who does he think he is, a Republican government official? He can testify via video link from prison. He was offered a chance to come in on his own. He’ll be found.

Edit: The news as of 20 minutes ago says he’s been snagged. I rest my case on the matter. A lot of people have been downvoting me the last few weeks as I insisted he would not get away with it.

47

Not_n_A-Hole_usually t1_iyk8bdf wrote

Well, a couple years ago there was a big kerfuffle about that in the news concerning PornHub. Apparently some content leaked past whatever moderating system they had in place. In response they simply removed a whole swath of content if there was no way to verify the ages of people in said videos and will not promote or allow uploads of anything they can’t 100% verify as being legal content. I imagine other “major” porn sites likely followed suit.

I can only imagine the amount of money a site like Pornhub pulls in on a monthly basis. Completely reasonable that they’d install a policy moving forward that anything unverifiable is denied a posting.

5