No-Satisfaction3455

No-Satisfaction3455 t1_ixn9l6x wrote

those are like guidelines and as long as the weapons are for "science" not war then it's fair game. we have a few weaponized up there ourselves, for "science" of course.

plus i think the beam will be indistinguishable to the average human at the power level in the article. so not scary space lasers

−3

No-Satisfaction3455 t1_ix70vam wrote

in 40 years dems never had a filibuster proof majority? 😅 at least don't lie for them, no they have not done anything beyond being corrupt corporate donor puppets for much longer. the voting history of these people are public.

seriously this isn't a true argument in the least, the dems are just as corrupt and beholden to donors positions. lgbtq rights weren't supported until it became a public/financial burden to not support it. Climate change and conservation were republican talking and campaign promises from inception all the way until reagan flipped the switch around 84'. Dems at this time flipped from industry first to nothing they still put profits and capital first over environment. so no it's a much deeper issue then one side being a bunch of idiots and the other complacent to the idiocy, they are all corrupt.

0

No-Satisfaction3455 t1_iwibgxn wrote

sorry i meant the usa's and any other completely polarized nations (aus, uk, etc) commitment and their lack of due to ongoing power shifts with people that act like fingers in their ears is a solution to this catastrophe.

if that wasn't understood. it's all for nothing and a show if the richest nations will not be stable enough to do anything.

3