No-Free-Lunche
No-Free-Lunche t1_ixqcgxv wrote
Are you familiar with cases of governments which ruled through obfuscation? E.g. all those in power don't rule, only use their power to get budgets, so since the ministers don't care about running their ministries, they agree with each other and others how to run things so they'll take minimal blame and have no liability to maximize their gains.
No-Free-Lunche t1_iwc2m1i wrote
Do you agree with the observation every fascistic regime is really an alliance between the titans of industry and the financial elite and politicians they support? If so, how does it explain the traction it has among the lower classes?
No-Free-Lunche t1_iwbbmn0 wrote
Reply to comment by jezreelite in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Maybe the closest would be N. Korea. Russia isn't really an example for anything.
I was unfamiliar with the Italian example but it's a lot less interesting to discuss a undeveloped 19th cen. state.
No-Free-Lunche t1_iw6tc92 wrote
Is there a precedent for a state which was taken over from within by criminals in a democratic way? There are all sorts of dictatorships, but usually those took over by a coup. The question refers to a nation where a gang, gangs, or an assortment of criminals, took over by exploiting democracy and employing populism slowing over years to convince everyone they should vote for them, e.g. by cutting deals with the media, finding ways to use institutions for their criminal activity like laundering money, etc.
I have on mind an example but want to hear your thoughts first.
No-Free-Lunche t1_ixyan04 wrote
Reply to Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
I asked here before but now added more details:
Is there a precedent for a state which was taken over from within by criminals in a democratic way? There are all sorts of dictatorships, but usually those took over by a coup. The question refers to a nation where a gang, gangs, or an assortment of criminals, took over by exploiting democracy and employing populism slowing over years to convince everyone they should vote for them, e.g. by cutting deals with the media, finding ways to use institutions for their criminal activity like laundering money, etc.
By gang I mean:
Of course in such a state there's little meaning to democracy, and this could go on only as long as the party doing that doesn't have to actually create policy which requires wide support and only keeps its power by handing out money to its supporters in all sorts of made up jobs and projects.
The example I have is a minority party which forms a coalition with other smaller parties by buying them out so they could win support.