No-Contribution-7871
No-Contribution-7871 t1_j1n40tc wrote
Reply to comment by TenaceErbaccia in Childhood body mass index is unlikely to have a big impact on children's mood or behavioural disorders by giuliomagnifico
Certainly, yes. But I'll be devil's postmodern advocate and say to be wary of all science which claims to be wholly objective and without influence.
No-Contribution-7871 t1_j1n19b3 wrote
Reply to comment by thruster_fuel69 in Childhood body mass index is unlikely to have a big impact on children's mood or behavioural disorders by giuliomagnifico
Nearly all studies should be taken with buckets of salt.
No-Contribution-7871 t1_it032lg wrote
Reply to comment by Darwins_Dog in Protein quality of soy and the effect of processing: A quantitative review. This quantitative review confirms that the majority of soy products have high protein quality scores. by grandlewis
that is because it is a threat to their identity.
No-Contribution-7871 t1_j1nd6mq wrote
Reply to comment by TenaceErbaccia in Childhood body mass index is unlikely to have a big impact on children's mood or behavioural disorders by giuliomagnifico
I didn't say that the buckets of salt should be aimed towards the objective data received from experiments, simply that they should be aimed at the all studies.
Data in itself is trivial in nature. Of course water freezes at 0 C and boils at 100 C, because that is part of what defines water. Performatively though, that very point is, although objective in one manner, used rhetorically. In the same fashion, data from objective studies must be interpreted by subjects which is where salt should be aimed at.