Natural-Bear-1557
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_ja06kas wrote
Where is this.
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iuawxz3 wrote
Reply to comment by tiredstars in Eli5: Anyone who knows their military history. Why was ‘going over the top’ used in WW1? by [deleted]
100% and thanks for explaining this. I wish I had more time to explain with 3 kids but you exactly what I wanted to say as well
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iuadzki wrote
Reply to comment by Pocok5 in Eli5: Anyone who knows their military history. Why was ‘going over the top’ used in WW1? by [deleted]
Yes! I always get it mixed up.
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iua6tup wrote
Reply to comment by luckygiraffe in Eli5: Anyone who knows their military history. Why was ‘going over the top’ used in WW1? by [deleted]
Totally agree to this and armchair historian
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iua0q28 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Eli5: Anyone who knows their military history. Why was ‘going over the top’ used in WW1? by [deleted]
A war of attrition is what you call a meat grinder. You can't have an decisive victory and you your's loose a lot of resources and the other side does too. It really comes down to who can throw more bodies at something also known as a punic victory
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_iu9yztb wrote
Reply to Eli5: Anyone who knows their military history. Why was ‘going over the top’ used in WW1? by [deleted]
There was no real use of air forces. The artillery was largely ineffectual against entrenched troops. Chemical was a VERY double edged sword.
So you were really only left with a creeping barrage or a mass formation running to the other line.
That was the biggest lesson learned in WW1 don't become entrenched because it becomes a war of attrition. Hence the German changes in WW2
Natural-Bear-1557 t1_ja07qg7 wrote
Reply to comment by Banana4scales in This vending machine only sells old Pokémon games by Banana4scales
Dang. I wish I lived closer but a plane ticket just wouldn't be rational.