Max-Phallus
Max-Phallus t1_jaf1n7i wrote
Reply to comment by Sluisifer in How to prevent gear moving on bar? by stehilton94
Completely agree. The number of "JB Weld" answers is saddening.
Max-Phallus t1_jaf1hx7 wrote
Reply to comment by jnemesh in How to prevent gear moving on bar? by stehilton94
The answer is always something much better than an epoxy glue, or tape that leaves residue.
Max-Phallus t1_jaf1bz3 wrote
Reply to How to prevent gear moving on bar? by stehilton94
If the the pin has snapped, it won't be aligned with the snapped piece, which is why you cannot remove the pin. What is stopping the gear from sliding off the shaft now that the pin/key is broken?
Max-Phallus t1_j9vx5kp wrote
What does it look like? I'd not take any answer here seriously if they haven't visually seen the problemo.
Max-Phallus OP t1_j6z839a wrote
Reply to comment by Any-Broccoli-3911 in Do photons of different wavelengths combine to make complex wave forms? by Max-Phallus
Thank you very much. I very appreciate your time to help me understand.
Max-Phallus OP t1_j6z4ctm wrote
Reply to comment by Any-Broccoli-3911 in Do photons of different wavelengths combine to make complex wave forms? by Max-Phallus
Right. So photons can more accurately be described as sine wave components/properties of waveforms?
Max-Phallus OP t1_j6z45xi wrote
Reply to comment by mckulty in Do photons of different wavelengths combine to make complex wave forms? by Max-Phallus
Thanks for the answer. I think it highlights some holes in my understanding though.
While we do mostly think of AM and FM radio transmissions; we can pass any waveform into an antenna.
Is the output from that antenna a variable waveform photon, or is it multiple photons of different wavelengths being produced at once.
Or is it pretty much semantics? Where a variable waveform is just one waveform, but it can be described as multiple photons of different wavelengths, as per it's Fourier transform?
Apologies if I'm being dim.
Max-Phallus t1_j60xhw0 wrote
Reply to comment by Killjoy911 in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
It's more likely the military were interested in the tech so invested in checking it out.
Max-Phallus t1_j0gk2us wrote
Reply to comment by Alis451 in Does rotation break relativity? by starfyredragon
If anyone is interested, gravity on the IIS is still 88.33% of earth's gravity. The IIS orbits around 408KM from sea level.
Here is a PowerShell script I wrote that will calculate earth's gravity at any given altitude (if you have windows, you can open it and copy&paste it in):
function Get-GravityAtAltitude
{
[CmdletBinding()]
Param
(
[double]$AltitudeKm,
[switch]$ReturnStats
)
BEGIN
{
$EarthParams = @{
MeanRadius = 6371.009 # KM
SeaLevelGravity = 9.80665 # m/s^2
}
}
PROCESS
{
$AltLevelGravity = $EarthParams['SeaLevelGravity'] * [Math]::Pow($EarthParams['MeanRadius'] / ($EarthParams['MeanRadius'] + $AltitudeKm), 2)
if($ReturnStats.IsPresent)
{
$EarthParams.Add('Altitude', $AltitudeKm)
$EarthParams.Add('AltLevelGravity', $AltLevelGravity)
$EarthParams.Add('GsAtGravity', ($AltLevelGravity / $EarthParams['SeaLevelGravity']).ToString('.00%'))
return [PsCustomObject]$EarthParams
}
else
{
return $AltLevelGravity
}
}
END {}
}
Get-GravityAtAltitude -ReturnStats -AltitudeKm 408
Max-Phallus t1_jaf3wtp wrote
Reply to comment by stehilton94 in How to prevent gear moving on bar? by stehilton94
Ah right, so you have removed the gear, but can't get the snapped off plastic out of the shaft?