Low-Restaurant3504

Low-Restaurant3504 t1_jebu62l wrote

The ideal scenario is to have enough time to get the populace to accept and treat the idea that success is not tied into a financial or external incentive but is found in contentment and creative exploration. You don't have to get it to be accepted wholesale, but just float it as a viable point of view. That would make a lot of the transition much easier.

That's... probably not in the cards, however.

1

Low-Restaurant3504 t1_je8a1dh wrote

Ooooh. Weaponizing mental health to win an online argument. Really not a whole lot lower you can go as a person. Hell, I find it distasteful, and if it's making me feel a bit icky, I can imagine how strongly that's gonna make others feel.

Be better. For real, man.

1

Low-Restaurant3504 t1_jdpvtl6 wrote

I'll take my chances. Let it loose. Either we die, drift into an overstimulated dream, or reach the apex of society. Dying by AI is such a dumb thing to worry about. Either you worry and are right, in which case you died, or you worry and you are wrong, in which case it's pointless. Same as worrying about getting nuked. The other two options sound fun. Let's fucking do this and see what happens! So exciting!

5

Low-Restaurant3504 t1_jaa4ip5 wrote

Can't help but think the Tower of Babel is a fitting parable to get aquainted with if you are going to game out this idea. Not from a religious point of view, but from the point of view of cultural equity and unification... I'm not sure you can accomplish what you are proposing while keeping cultural distinctions intact. Then again, never been done before, so who knows?

1