Exposing mindless fanatics , watching them crumble with facts , seeing them not having arguments and consorting name callings is priceless , it gives me immense pleasure

It not my information , it's not my chart , just pure facts you can't stand

what happened to "deforestation rate plummeted the second he walked in" argument? it became 2 years now?
Bolsonaro did a better job protecting the forest than Lula did according to the numbers
Lula tripled in deforestation , besides the guy is a thief , you don't even know what he is selling from his country
You are such a mindless champagne socialists lot

Let's just say for a second that I am misleading
There is something called fact checking , you can always google rates and see yourself , nobody is stopping you
Here is a link for you , unless you claim I invented Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_in_Brazil?fbclid=IwAR2NlH3GqYRlde70XofgAHJNYuujsG3YuyyLwIl-Fdb6gqojTwvmgOxAd0k#Rates

Fernando Henrique Cardoso (president of Brazil before Lula)

1999 total loss 17,259

2000 total loss 18,226

2001 total loss 18,165

2002 total loss 21,651

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula)

2003 total loss 25,396

2004 total loss 27,772

2005 total loss 19,014

2006 total loss 14,285

Does this look like an improvement to you?

Fernando Henrique Cardoso (president of Brazil before Lula)

1999 total loss 17,259
2000 total loss 18,226
2001 total loss 18,165
2002 total loss 21,651

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula)

2003 total loss 25,396
2004 total loss 27,772
2005 total loss 19,014
2006 total loss 14,285

Does that look like 75% less to you?

I am giving you stats

Deforestation of Lula's term is more than the double of Bolsonaro's term of deforestation , first two years consistently increasing , how's that the "second he walked in plummeted" for an argument?

Data is clear is the only part I can agree with you ! you should look at it sometimes

When you start name calling someone, it's a sign of losing an argument , what a loser .... hahahaa

When Lula walked into the office deforestation increased first year in comparison to the previous president , in his second year deforestation increased in comparison to his first year , so we are talking about two years consistently increasing. Numbers don't lie !

So your argument he couldn't in one year is not true

In fact first 4 years of deforestation of Lula's term is more than double of 4 years of Bolsonaro deforestation

You are a fanatic , can't be argued even with facts

By that logic , how do you hold Bolsonaro responsible of deforestation as a president but not Lula as a president?

People can down-vote me as much as they want , doesn't mean anything , I will continue standing by the truth. The ones don't have any argument are being crushed by the facts , not by emotionally driven fanatics

I guess I am good at wasting my time with fanatics who can't accept facts

Is that what happened? he signed the paper but the delivery was slow argument?

The second he walked in the office deforestation increased the first year , the second year was higher than his first year

How do you account that?

Lula came into the office in 2003 not in 2005
so how do you account for :

2003 total loss 25,396 km2

2004 total loss 27,772 km2

Apply that logic here please

1- it's not my information

2- I gave you the link , you are the one who is not looking at numbers

3- you are just a fanatic who is denying numbers blatantly because they don't agree with you

there were 8 judges and they read his crimes for 4 hours , the only crook was his friend in the supreme court got him out of prison because the trial was supposed to take place in Brasilia instead of Curitiba , he got him out on technicality , not because he was proven innocent

so how do you account for :

2003 total loss 25,396 km2

2004 total loss 27,772 km2

Apply that logic here please , and explain it to me how is that plummeted the second he walked in ?

Data is so simple and , you don't / can't even read yet calling me toddler

case was dropped due to loophole , not because he was acquitted of the crimes

Isn't he an ex-con?