Lance-Harper

Lance-Harper t1_je1fgu0 wrote

It’s not just that.

  • heavy duty work do not qualify anymore for compensation which is why bin men are striking
  • to get your full pension, you must work without any stop from your 20s to your 60s. No illness, break, year off whatsoever
  • point 2 implies you must make a choice very early in life wether you want an under educated job or a masters degree and so forth.
  • all of the above with no guarantee that it all won’t happen again while you’re not even yet 64. Since the reason that cause it haven’t been adress.
  • edit: and AI is brining a lot of uncertainty into the job market. If you are about or graduate, I’d be worried to death about my future
  • all whilst the rich got richer, threaten to take their wealth away, if you wish to tax them and the larger companies get record profit even as the economy slows down.

For sure most people are in the streets for the extra 2 years but there’s a lot more going on.

164

Lance-Harper t1_j1pyqi3 wrote

You’re making it way more complex than it is.

That’s no « different » way to think about it. Space creating more space at each point in space is exactly the way. To add « god mode » to your explanation will only get people more confused, but doesn’t add to your explanation at all since something not testable/observable is sterile in the exercise of explaining something to someone.

You could just say that one will realise going from one wall to the opposite takes longer, then one chair to the next. You can add that if extrapolated, one day the distance between the chairs will be longer than the initial distance between walls. People will be wowed and will begin to understand how expansion works.

I do not see why you went into relativity, nor what « perspective of space look into mass » mean.

My advice is keep it to what you’re trying to explain, and evaluate if adding more confuses more or not. It takes time. Even Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson spends days on one way to explain things in one shot in a compelling way.

2

Lance-Harper t1_j1fqibj wrote

Time to Saturn

  • time through WH
  • time to go from one planet to the other
  • time spent on each planet
  • time inside BH

Equates to both cooper’s biological clock and a watch on his wrist.

For the real world, we got data, for the part from WH to BH we got some data but not a lot.

2

Lance-Harper t1_j1fpxup wrote

But they’d relative to the rest of the universe. Op question is: whey would a clock on cooper’s wrist say from the moment he ignited the rocket to the moment he is picked up by the humans he saved

1

Lance-Harper t1_j1fp9t5 wrote

It is an open suestion:

  • if it’s future us, the story becomes a grandfather loophole
  • if not, it’s plain linear

But with what the movie gives us, it’s impossible to know

1

Lance-Harper t1_j1ey26f wrote

Precisely.

It is a bit deus ex machina. « A bit » because deus ex machina is an intervention suppose to solve the main plot whilst cooper’s life or death is secondary once he gave the data away.

But yeah, in short, beings able to place a wormhole leading to a black hole are powerful enough to place and replace a human being, that’s a fair assumption

16