Nice. Thanks for taking the time to implement and to share. I get the feeling that this approach will be way more coherent for certain types of content and layout (mayhaps when prompting something like “a tiger and a bunny sitting side by side” and the “traditional” (is it old enough to have traditions yet?) approach will be better for other types, perhaps such as “a tiger and a bunny”, where the intent is what that approach often results in, some interpolation between the two objects; a chimera or mutant.
Or maybe another way to explain is that this MagixMix is akin to orchestration of multiple parts, and the present approach is more akin to a mashup of multiple parts; each has its own strengths and appropriate applications.
Inevitable-Ad8503 t1_iuth7a3 wrote
Reply to [P] Implementation of MagicMix from ByteDance researchers, - New way to interpolate concepts with much more natural, geometric coherency (implemented with Stable Diffusion!) by cloneofsimo
Nice. Thanks for taking the time to implement and to share. I get the feeling that this approach will be way more coherent for certain types of content and layout (mayhaps when prompting something like “a tiger and a bunny sitting side by side” and the “traditional” (is it old enough to have traditions yet?) approach will be better for other types, perhaps such as “a tiger and a bunny”, where the intent is what that approach often results in, some interpolation between the two objects; a chimera or mutant.
Or maybe another way to explain is that this MagixMix is akin to orchestration of multiple parts, and the present approach is more akin to a mashup of multiple parts; each has its own strengths and appropriate applications.