Thanks for weighing in. The more nuanced reality is that in its current form AI generated content certainly can appear to carry a message on its own, successfully convice viewers that it is human generated art, and create content that humans cam interpret/react to emotionally.
And I agree with you that this can still open up possibilities for creators who use these tools to augment their work.
One very unfortunate part of that is that lots of folks have jobs that can be replicable by a machine -- marketing copy, user interfaces, technical concept art, etc.
There will be disruptions in the job market because a lot of people don't have the privilege of not creating commercial crap. That will get very disrupted, and AIML will continue to grow in sophistication.
Important-Fee-658 t1_j5tu2dx wrote
Reply to comment by Chad_Abraxas in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
Thanks for weighing in. The more nuanced reality is that in its current form AI generated content certainly can appear to carry a message on its own, successfully convice viewers that it is human generated art, and create content that humans cam interpret/react to emotionally.
And I agree with you that this can still open up possibilities for creators who use these tools to augment their work.
One very unfortunate part of that is that lots of folks have jobs that can be replicable by a machine -- marketing copy, user interfaces, technical concept art, etc.
There will be disruptions in the job market because a lot of people don't have the privilege of not creating commercial crap. That will get very disrupted, and AIML will continue to grow in sophistication.