Fun-Transition1230
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je7uimp wrote
Reply to comment by Archimedes_Redux in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
No because of the (insert minority party) meddling.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je7q8bm wrote
Reply to comment by Archimedes_Redux in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
Always excellent grain harvests. Economy is strong.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je76m42 wrote
Reply to comment by NBA_Fan_76 in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
What do you prefer as your source of propoganda? USA today or Good Morning America?
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je7395k wrote
Reply to comment by Moist_Lunch_5075 in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
LOL yes the same amount of women were in the workforce in the 1950s as today. Truck drivers, police officers, engineers, surgeons, etc... women didn't stay at home in the 1950s..
All of the baby boomers were raised by single moms too?
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6y9d2 wrote
Reply to comment by zoiddirkoid in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
Unemployment rate uses the same math as Chairman Maos grain harvests.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6y09j wrote
Reply to comment by zoiddirkoid in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
So if they eliminated unemployment, nobody would be looking for a job and the rate would be 0%?
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6xb42 wrote
Reply to comment by Moist_Lunch_5075 in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
It was around 60% in the 1950s when women stayed at home. Now workforce is about 46% women and it is still 60%?
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6wm28 wrote
Reply to comment by zoiddirkoid in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
What would happen to the unemployment rate if they changed the amount of time people could collect benefits to 99 weeks like in 2009?
Would we still have a super strong job market with 3% unemployment?
People who get their news from Good Morning America think 3% unemployment = 97% employment.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6hpu4 wrote
Reply to comment by Walla_Walla_26 in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
Mad max/famine situation unemployment will be 0% strong strong jobs market.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je6he58 wrote
Reply to comment by Walla_Walla_26 in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
Unemployment numbers are fudge.
If you go to the poorest housing project the unemployment rate will be under 3% because nobody is eligible to collect unemployment.
Employment rate is around 60%
Fun-Transition1230 t1_jct3wmz wrote
Reply to Found this at my local liquor store today. The more you look at it the funnier it gets. by Balbers01
Smells fruity and tastes sweet but burns like hell and leaves a rotten aftertaste in your mouth.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_ja0s2cd wrote
Reply to comment by phadrus56 in LPT: the rubber nubs on a stern quality masturbation glove can also make for quick work of not only, say, the dishes but also in pre-meal prep when scrubbing potatoes and other root crops by [deleted]
Sure, aisle 5 near the dishwashing soap.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_j01bugz wrote
Reply to comment by Frontstunderel in Two Philadelphia Men Charged With Three Summer 2022 Carjackings Across the City by TreeMac12
That was their employment. Now they get to go to "college" for 142 months for more training.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_j01bp4a wrote
Reply to Landlord had electricity as $80 plus rent, now wants me to put account that already had a balance on it, in my name. by thatboul1000
If it is a shared meter, I would suggest she puts it in one of the other tenants names.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_iu78qxj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in 11th & Spruce this morning by Erops
I'm in the early stages of moving from NYC to South Philly. I am utterly blown away by how clean and well kept everything is in South Philly compared to what I am used to. I feel like I am in Canada or Europe. I didn't think such clean and well cared for urban neighborhoods still existed in the US. You can walk from Passyunk to Rittenhouse Square and not see hardly any graffiti and smell no urine at all.
Philadelphia completely underrated, it is a national treasure.
Fun-Transition1230 t1_iu770km wrote
Reply to I booked a hotel in Philadelphia and got a reservation confirmation with some stock photo picture of geeks riding bikes. Will I actually be able to ride a bike in Philly or will I be run over by a psycho? by solo-ran
Depends on what you mean by biking. If you are planning to put on rainbow colored spandex and do a 100km race through the streets, Philly kind of sucks for cycling.
If you just want to cruise around leisurely to see the city and use the bike as a sort of transportation and enjoy yourself, Philly is fantastic for cycling. I'm a daily bike commuter in NYC and to me Philly is so much better. The roads are narrower so the cars go slower. Philly is a fantastic city to explore by bike, IMHO the best city for bike adventures in the USA.
You don't have to worry about getting run over by a psycho because traffic is so bad cars don't have a chance to go that fast. Just watch out for cars like when you were 10
Fun-Transition1230 t1_je7y4gi wrote
Reply to comment by Archimedes_Redux in Stagflation 2023: The Looming Economic Nightmare You Can't Afford to Ignore by Wega58
Only since Nixon. Before that the US built all sorts of massive infrastructure projects like China does now.
We're only affluent now because everyone believes our tulips are actually worth something.