Exciting-Engineer646
Exciting-Engineer646 t1_izd70cq wrote
Reply to comment by kayhai in [Discussion] No-code ML for engineers by kayhai
Not your knowledge, but theirs! If you want this to be fully code free, they probably need to own the data end as well.
I trust very few people on knowing which model their data can support. So even if you can find a code free solution, you still need to find a scalable solution for data curation and model selection.
Exciting-Engineer646 t1_izd6iej wrote
Reply to [Discussion] No-code ML for engineers by kayhai
I hate to ask this, but how well do they understand their data? Bad data, distributions that break assumptions (heavy tails, autocorrelation, etc), missing data, and all of the rest will cause model failures even if they are able to code. If it is worthwhile for your company to use that data then they need to properly resource it.
Exciting-Engineer646 t1_iwaiqoz wrote
Reply to comment by Exciting-Engineer646 in [D] ML/AI role as a disabled person by badhandml
You might be a great fit for this: https://machinelearning.apple.com/updates/aiml-residency-program-application-2023
Exciting-Engineer646 t1_iwaie7b wrote
Reply to [D] ML/AI role as a disabled person by badhandml
Apple: accessibility and ML is very much a thing. How can one interact with devices when one can’t use the standard interface? Apple wants devices that work for all users.
Exciting-Engineer646 t1_izd724x wrote
Reply to comment by kayhai in [Discussion] No-code ML for engineers by kayhai
Not your knowledge, but theirs! If you want this to be fully code free, they probably need to own the data end as well.
I trust very few people on knowing which model their data can support. So even if you can find a code free solution, you still need to find a scalable solution for data curation and model selection.