ET-bunny
ET-bunny t1_j2bdn90 wrote
Reply to Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
21/21 (on mobile) But I spent a few years in an art atelier and I'm also familiar with digital art and photography. I also scan fine art for a living.
The blue in the Degas ballerina painting was a dead giveaway.
The JFK portrait was easy if you're familiar with how film photography looks -- the grain just has a certain look to it.
The background in the sumi scroll made no sense.
Photos made me think a bit longer, but the composition (and hands, of course) gave away the AI images. The volcano photo, for instance -- the human captured one has more depth in both the scene and subject (caldera in the foreground, mountain in the distance with more layers of atmosphere). Boring flat composition with no real focal point or visual narrative gave away the bot images.
ET-bunny t1_isuo6p8 wrote
Reply to comment by paints_cats in My painting of our endless summer at Hoh River, watercolor, 9x12" by paints_cats
Been quite warm this october. Lovely painting, really loving those rich blues in the distance. Particularly the silhouetted evergreens.
Beautiful work. 💙
ET-bunny t1_isrv93e wrote
Plein air?
ET-bunny t1_j2be8nv wrote
Reply to comment by Shiningc in Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
I think it's more accurate to call "AI art" just "image generation" because that's what it is.
AI image generators are not artists.