Drago-0900
Drago-0900 OP t1_je0g2ku wrote
Reply to comment by rhalf in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
Ill definitely try those KCS75s and a SHP9500 after I get paid. After all I did just buy around 80$ in car speaker equipment. Thanks for the info though
Drago-0900 OP t1_jdzcdqw wrote
Reply to comment by rhalf in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
The headphones in question are sony whxm4s. And the loudspeakers sound much more clear with better bass, mid, and treble.
Drago-0900 OP t1_jdzbtc7 wrote
Reply to comment by SupOrSalad in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
While the xm4s I definitely knew they werent going to be audiophile but being beaten out by some budget car speakers should not be a thing. What I was thinking was doing a 2-3 way headphone driver having the frequencies being split to multi drivers made sense to me. As like others have said, a big cone is going to have a hard time doing highs accurately.
Drago-0900 OP t1_jdzbm6d wrote
Reply to comment by AnotherSpecificDuck in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
So why do IEMs do it when wouldnt headphones stand to benefit the most from it, being able to have the lows and mids on the woofer and a tweeter to do all the highs?
Drago-0900 OP t1_jdzbj63 wrote
Reply to comment by rhalf in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
Interesting, just was something I noticed that multi driver loudspeakers sounded better than my headphones ive got while being way cheaper. Kinda makes sense, like I could understand being able to hear the music coming from another driver. Thank you for your reply.
Submitted by Drago-0900 t3_124a1wu in headphones
Drago-0900 OP t1_je0ga9w wrote
Reply to comment by AnotherSpecificDuck in Quick question why do we not see coaxial speakers in headphones that often? by Drago-0900
I see, thanks