Direct-Ad-7922

Direct-Ad-7922 t1_j0a3fpd wrote

I used to think the same way - truly - I even developed wireless power transfer tools for using car batteries for distributed storage.

It’s the sustainability of storage that’s the problem - it costs too much and it doesn’t last long enough.

The thing is normal people vote for politicians who vote to spend billions on tech like this which doesn’t actually solve the problem.

We blow money like nobodies business

1

Direct-Ad-7922 t1_j09x1e1 wrote

If you want more details then there is this pretty cool website called Google.

Or, feel free to scroll up and follow any of the 5 different resources that that I linked earlier.

Although if you really wanted to understand what I mean you would have done this already.

At this point I think you are purposely deluding yourself too

1

Direct-Ad-7922 t1_j077ce3 wrote

And if they make even more money off of sales then it’s worth it.

We spent more on nuclear power. And we make a lot of money off of it

This solar is just marketing tactics. Cause they know people falsely believe it’s sustainable.

Meanwhile they are quietly building more nuclear plants than any other country in history.

https://thediplomat.com/2022/09/powering-chinas-nuclear-ambitions/

They may very well have a cleaner country than most in the very near future

1

Direct-Ad-7922 t1_j049y49 wrote

After I graduated as an electrical engineer I thought solar and storage was the answer. I designed wireless power transfer systems for vehicles to become mobile power storages for the grid

And then I started working and realized the difference between research and real-life

The best resources I can share are from these professionals

https://www.linkedin.com/in/zionlights

https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewakker

Another place to learn: watch Planet of the Humans

−12