Danny-Dynamita

Danny-Dynamita t1_j5xcx3o wrote

The best thing I see about this idea is the possibility of creating nuclear energy in a more granular temporality and budget.

Instead of spending 26b$ and 10 years in one big reactor, we can spend a quarter of that money and time in these smaller reactors. If we see the need to keep expanding nuclear power, we could do so very easily while we would be able to see the benefit of each project in just a few years. A big grid of these would be just the same as multiple big reactors, no extra difficulty is added, but you can expand it at will in small increments that are doable within one democratic term (oh god, that’s so important nowadays!).

1

Danny-Dynamita t1_j4zv04l wrote

From the comments I’m reading, you’re all trying to explain something that can not be explained, only learned through experience.

I lost my mom a few weeks ago in a matter of 24h. I would do anything to go back and send her to the hospital a day before, just so that she could endure a life-saving procedure to live a few more years, even if with some discomfort. Why? Because of how I lived the situation.

It’s a matter of perspective. You can’t teach what’s RIGHT or WRONG, because no one knows that, we can only say that we feel in a certain way because of our past experiences.

1