Current-Photo2857

Current-Photo2857 t1_jecc1p2 wrote

One sister is in the medical field, has to live out east bc she could only get a job at MassGen (her specialty is nonexistent out here); sister who is in early education had to go to CT to get a job. My BIL is in construction and spends half the year unemployed. I’m a teacher in a district of about 500 staff, 25+ of us will be laid off next month because the district can’t afford to pay us. Meanwhile, I can’t keep a steady GP because my medical provider’s offices keep closing, first the one in Wilbraham, then Westfield, so now I’m stuck going to Springfield with my third different doctor who is impossible to get an appointment with because the few doctors who did stay in the area have too many patients.

2

Current-Photo2857 t1_je1a4a4 wrote

You wouldn’t get daylight in the winter waking up at 4am anyway? In standard time, winter sunrise is around 7am or later (which is when PLENTY of people are waking up/heading to school or work)…if we were in DST in the winter, sunrises would be as late as almost 8:30 for some areas, and most people need to be awake and at work before then.

3

Current-Photo2857 t1_jdymom4 wrote

And on the flip side, having extra daylight late at night tricks your body into thinking it’s earlier than it is and you take longer to go to sleep (which is why the experts who proposed the act said people lose an average of 30 something minutes of sleep per night during DST).

9

Current-Photo2857 t1_jdx2bd1 wrote

The benefit under the current method of biannually changing the clock is that we don’t have 8:30 sunrises in the winter (this is good, it’s proven we need daylight to fully awaken) but can also have 9:00 sunsets in the summer (this is unnecessary and actual bad for your health, it tricks your body into staying up later).

Most sleep experts agree that we should be in year-round standard time, and there was a bill proposed called the “Save Our Sleep Act” that would have done this.

3

Current-Photo2857 t1_jaezeoo wrote

Reply to comment by Prudent-Ball2698 in sex offenders by Prudent-Ball2698

And if someone sold your kid heroin and they od’ed, I’d bet you’d vote “not guilty” because that was the kid’s choice, right? And I never said sex offenders don’t deserve to be in prison, only that drug dealers and murderers deserve worse.

1

Current-Photo2857 t1_jaeulbd wrote

Murders should be executed, preferably in the way they killed their victim. Drug dealers should be charged as attempted murders, if one of their “customers” dies of an OD, the dealer’s method of execution should be the same.

0